Wind assessment in a coastal environment using synthetic aperture radar satellite imagery and a numerical weather prediction model

被引:25
作者
Beaucage, Philippe [1 ]
Glazer, Anna [2 ]
Choisnard, Julien [2 ]
Yu, Wei [2 ]
Bernier, Monique [3 ]
Benoit, Robert [2 ]
Lafrance, Gaetan [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Natl Rech Sci UQ, Varennes, PQ J3X 1S2, Canada
[2] Environm Canada, Dorval, PQ H9P 1J3, Canada
[3] Inst Natl Rech Sci UQ, Ste Foy, PQ G1K 9A9, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.5589/m07-043
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Wind assessment in a coastal environment remains a complex issue for both synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite imagery and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. This study compares the accuracy of each technique to improve the overall mapping precision of both methods. On the one hand, 14 RADARSAT-1 scenes of the St. Lawrence River (Canada) are converted into wind speeds using a hybrid model function that consists of the CMOD-IFR2 geophysical model function and a C-band polarization ratio. A priori information on wind directions is gathered from QuikSCAT scatterometer and in situ wind data. On the other hand, co-located wind maps are generated with the Environment Canada mesoscale compressible community (MC2) model. Comparisons between these two methods are then presented according to three approaches: a systematic SAR and MC2 comparison at 4 km grid-point spacing, a validation with observations (buoy and QuikSCAT scatterometer), and a local analysis of SAR and MC2 winds along a transect perpendicular to the coastline. The main features of the offshore wind fields are well resolved by both methods. The comparison study shows that SAR and MC2 winds have good agreement, with a root mean square difference for wind speeds of 2.07 m/s and a bias of 0.13 m/s.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 377
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Benoit R, 1997, MON WEATHER REV, V125, P2382, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<2382:TCMASL>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
Benoit R, 2002, B AM METEOROL SOC, V83, P85, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0085:TRTUFS>2.3.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   SeaWinds validation with research vessels [J].
Bourassa, MA ;
Legler, DM ;
O'Brien, JJ ;
Smith, SR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2003, 108 (C2)
[6]   Assimilation of ERS-2 scatterometer winds using the Canadian 3D-var [J].
Buehner, M .
ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2002, 40 (03) :361-376
[7]   MEDIUM-SCALE TURBULENCE IN THE TRADE WINDS [J].
CHARNOCK, H ;
FRANCIS, JRD ;
SHEPPARD, PA ;
PASQUILL, F ;
MURGATROYD, RJ ;
MALKUS, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1955, 81 (350) :634-635
[8]   Scatterometer-based assessment of 10-m wind analyses from the operational ECMWF and NCEP numerical weather prediction models [J].
Chelton, DB ;
Freilich, MH .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (02) :409-429
[9]  
Choisnard J, 2003, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P2700
[10]   Mapping of the winds in the Gulf of St. Lawrence using RADARSAT-1 images [J].
Choisnard, J ;
Bernier, M ;
Lafrance, G .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 30 (04) :604-616