The politics of governance ratings

被引:58
作者
Arndt, Christiane [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Grad Sch Governance, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10967490802301278
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Some international organizations, and most prominently the World Bank, play a leading role in the supply of cross-country governance ratings. The paper draws on interviews of World Bank staff to understand why the World Bank produces cross-country comparable indicators and to bring to light the current controversies within the World Bank about existing indicators and future work on governance indicators. It also attempts to explain why so many external users rely on the Worldwide Governance Indicators, despite the limitations of these indicators and the large number of more meaningful, alternative indicators available. It argues that both robust and meaningful indicators and more qualitative research are necessary to give better reform advice to developing countries.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 297
页数:23
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Alonso William., 1987, POLITICS NUMBERS
[2]  
ANDERSON J, 2007, COMMENTS 1 DRA UNPUB
[3]  
ANDREWS M, 2008, 08014 KSG HARV U
[4]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC SERVICE PERFO
[5]  
[Anonymous], EGPA ANN C STUD GROU
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 569252 WORLD BANK
[7]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES 0712
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PERFORMANCE INFORM P, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-10541-7
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2 BEST I
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1991, DEMOCRACY BUREAUCRAC