Merging intelligent agency and the semantic web

被引:10
作者
Debenharn, John [1 ]
Sierra, Carles
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] CSIC, Spanish Sci Res Council, Inst Invest Intel Ligencia Artificial 3A, Bellaterra 08193, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
intelligent agents; Semantic Web; information-based agency; Bayesian inference; negotiation;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2007.11.004
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Semantic Web makes unique demands on agency. Such agents should: be built around an ontology and should take advantage of the relations in it, be based on a grounded approach to uncertainty, be able to deal naturally with the issue of semantic alignment, and deal with interaction in a way that is suited to the co-ordination of services. A new breed of 'information-based' intelligent agents [C. Sierra, J. Debenham, Information-based agency, in: Proceedings of Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI-07, Hyderabad, India, 2007, pp. 1513-1518.] meets these demands. This form of agency is founded on ideas from information theory, and was inspired by the insight that interaction is an information revelation and discovery process. Ontologies are fundamental to these agent's reasoning that relies on semantic distance measures. They employ entropy-based inference, a form of Bayesian inference, to manage uncertainty that they represent using probability distributions. Semantic alignment is managed through a negotiation process during which the agent's uncertain beliefs are continually revised. The co-ordination of services is achieved by modelling interaction as time-constrained, resource-constrained processes - a proven application of agent technology. In addition, measures of trust, reputation, and reliability are unified in a single model. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 191
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ARCOS JL, 2005, J ENG APPL ART INT, V18
[2]  
Berners-Lee Tim, 2006, Foundations and Trends in Web Science, V1, P1, DOI 10.1561/1800000001
[3]  
Cheeseman P, 2004, AIP CONF PROC, V735, P445, DOI 10.1063/1.1835243
[4]  
DEBENHAM J, 2004, P 3 INT C AUT AG MUL, P664
[5]  
DEBENHAM J, 2005, P 4 INT C AUT AG MUL, P175
[6]   Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations [J].
Faratin, P ;
Sierra, C ;
Jennings, NR .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 142 (02) :205-237
[7]   Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges [J].
Jennings, NR ;
Faratin, P ;
Lomuscio, AR ;
Parsons, S ;
Wooldridge, MJ ;
Sierra, C .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2001, 10 (02) :199-215
[8]  
Kalfoglou Y, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2800, P98
[9]   Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments [J].
Kraus, S .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 94 (1-2) :79-97
[10]  
Li YH, 2003, IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN, V15, P871, DOI 10.1109/TKDE.2003.1209005