Effectiveness of cervical cerclage for a sonographically shortened cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:44
作者
Belej-Rak, T
Okun, N
Windrim, R
Ross, S
Hannah, ME
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Maternal Infant & Repdoc Hlth Res Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
cervical incompetence; cervical cerclage; transvaginal ultrasound; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00871-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of cerclage for a shortened cervix on transvaginal ultrasound scanning in terms of the rates of preterm delivery and adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Pre-MEDLINE and MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for human studies that compared cerclage placement to no cerclage on the basis of transvaginal ultrasound findings of a short cervix (less than or equal to2.5 cm). Two authors independently determined eligibility and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were reviewed; 6 studies were eligible and were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant effect of cerclage on the rates of preterm delivery (<37, <34, <32, and <28 weeks of gestation), preterm labor, neonatal mortality or morbidity, gestational age at delivery, or time to delivery. Birth weight was significantly higher with than without cerclage (P =.004). CONCLUSION: The available evidence does not support cerclage for a sonographically detected short cervix. A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine whether this intervention will reduce adverse neonatal outcomes. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1679-87.)
引用
收藏
页码:1679 / 1687
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Cervical incompetence: A reappraisal of an obstetric controversy [J].
Althuisius, SM ;
Dekker, GA ;
van Geijn, HP .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2002, 57 (06) :377-387
[2]   Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): Therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone [J].
Althuisius, SM ;
Dekker, GA ;
Hummel, P ;
Bekedam, DJ ;
van Geijn, HP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) :1106-1112
[3]   Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): Study design and preliminary results [J].
Althuisius, SM ;
Dekker, GA ;
van Geijn, HP ;
Bekedam, DJ ;
Hummel, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (04) :823-829
[4]  
*AM COLL OBST OBST, 2001, ACOG PRACTICE B, V31, P709
[5]  
ANSARI AH, 1987, J REPROD MED, V32, P161
[6]  
BALDE M D, 1991, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et biologie de la Reproduction, V20, P675
[7]  
Benham BN, 2002, AUST NZ J OBSTET GYN, V42, P46
[8]   Patterns of normal change in cervical length and width during pregnancy in nulliparous women: a prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study [J].
Bergelin, I ;
Valentin, L .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (03) :217-222
[9]   Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: Does cerclage prevent prematurity? [J].
Berghella, V ;
Daly, SF ;
Tolosa, JE ;
DiVito, MM ;
Chalmers, R ;
Garg, N ;
Bhullar, A ;
Wapner, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (04) :809-815
[10]  
BESINGER RE, 1993, CURR OPIN OBSTET GYN, V5, P33