Do laryngeal mask airway devices attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx?: A randomized, controlled cadaver study

被引:30
作者
Keller, C
Brimacombe, J
Rädler, C
Pühringer, F
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Cairns Base Hosp, Cairns 4870, Australia
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199904000-00040
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In this randomized, controlled cadaver study, we tested the hypothesis that the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx. Fifty fresh cadavers were studied in four LMA groups. Ten female cadavers had a size 4 LMA and 10 had a size 4 FLMA; 10 male cadavers had a size 5 LMA and 10 had a size 5 FLMA;5 male and 5 female cadavers functioned as controls. The chest was opened, and the infusion set of a pressure-controlled, continuous flow pump was inserted into the esophagus and ligated into place. Esophageal pressure was increased in 2-cm H2O increments. Regurgitation pressure was the esophageal pressure at which fluid was first seen with a fiberoptic scope in the hypopharynx (control group) and above the cuff or within the bowl (LMA groups). This was performed in the LMA groups at 0-40 mL cuff volume in 10-mL increments. Mean (95% confidence interval) regurgitation pressure for the control group was 7 (6-8) cm H2O and for the LMA groups combined was 19 (17-20) cm H2O at 0 mL cuff volume, 47 (41-52) cm H2O at 10 mL, 51 (44-55) cm H2O at 20 mL, 52 (45-56) cm H2O at 30 mL, and 52 (45-55) cm H2O at 40 mL. The increase in regurgitation pressure with increasing cuff volume from 0 to 10 mt was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Regurgitation pressure was higher for the LMA groups at all cuff volumes compared with the control group (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in regurgitation pressure among the LMA groups. We conclude that the correctly placed LMA and FLMA attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx. Implications: We have shown, in cadavers, that the correctly placed standard and flexible laryngeal mask airways attenuate liquid flow between the pharynx and esophagus.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 907
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Laryngeal mask airway and the incidence of regurgitation during gynecological laparoscopies [J].
Bapat, PP ;
Verghese, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (01) :139-143
[2]  
BRAIN AIJ, 1995, LMA INSTRUCTION MANU
[3]   A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (06) :1379-1382
[4]   Cricoid pressure [J].
Brimacombe, JR ;
Berry, AM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (04) :414-425
[5]   THE INCIDENCE OF ASPIRATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY - A METAANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED LITERATURE [J].
BRIMACOMBE, JR ;
BERRY, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (04) :297-305
[6]  
Brimacombe JR, 1997, The Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Review and Practical Guide
[7]   MECHANISM OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN RECUMBENT ASYMPTOMATIC HUMAN-SUBJECTS [J].
DENT, J ;
DODDS, WJ ;
FRIEDMAN, RH ;
SEKIGUCHI, T ;
HOGAN, WJ ;
ARNDORFER, RC ;
PETRIE, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1980, 65 (02) :256-267
[8]   ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA AND THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY [J].
GRIFFIN, RM ;
HATCHER, IS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (12) :1039-1040
[9]   GASTRIC DISTENSION - A MECHANISM FOR POSTPRANDIAL GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX [J].
HOLLOWAY, RH ;
HONGO, M ;
BERGER, K ;
MCCALLUM, RW .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1985, 89 (04) :779-784
[10]   Continuous hypopharyngeal pH measurements in spontaneously breathing anesthetized outpatients: Laryngeal mask airway versus tracheal intubation [J].
Joshi, GP ;
Morrison, SG ;
Okonkwo, NA ;
White, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (02) :254-257