A comparison of buccal Midazolam and rectal diazepam for the acute treatment of seizures

In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate buccal midazolam as a practical and safe alternative medication for children who suffer from seizures in the emergency setting and in home practice or anywhere. The effects and side effects of buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam were compared in the treatment of acute convulsions in 43 children, ranging in age from 2 months to 12,ears who were seen at the emergency service of the children hospital. Midazolam was given on the even days of the month and diazepam was given on the odd days. In the midazolam group, the seizures of 18/23 (78%) patients terminated in 10 minutes; however 5/23 (22%) patients did not respond. In the diazepam group 17/20 (85%) patients responded in 10 minutes, but 3/20 (15%) did not respond. Midazolam was found to be as effective as diazepam and the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.05). Response periods of the 2 drugs showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The need for a second drug for seizures that did not stop with the first drug was equal, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). They did not observe any serious complications. In conclusion, buccal midazolam is safe and as effective as rectal diazepam for the treatment of seizures.