Two regions in the N-terminal domain of ionotropic glutamate receptor 3 form the subunit oligomerization interfaces that control subtype-specific receptor assembly

被引:49
作者
Ayalon, G
Segev, E
Elgavish, S
Stern-Bach, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Dent Sch, Inst Basic Dent Sci, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hadassah Med Sch, Struct Biol Bioinformat Unit, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M408413200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The N-terminal domain (NTD) of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5- methylisoxazolepropionate ( AMPA) and kainate glutamate receptors plays an important role in controlling subtype specific receptor assembly. To identify NTD subdomains involved in this process we generated AMPA glutamate receptor 3 (GluR3) mutants having intra-NTD substitutions with the corresponding regions of the kainate receptor GluR6 and tested their ability to form functional heteromers with wild-type subunits. The chimeric design was based on the homology of the NTD to the NTD of the metabotropic GluR1, shown to form two globular lobes and to assemble in dimers. Accordingly, the NTD was divided into four regions, termed here N1 - N4, of which N1 and N3 correspond to the regions forming lobe-1 and N2 and N4 to those forming lobe-2. Substituting N1 or N3 impaired functional heteromerization but allowed protein-protein interactions. Conversely, exchanging N2 or N4 preserved functional heteromerization, although it significantly decreased homomeric activity, indicating a role in subunit folding. Moreover, a deletion in GluR3 corresponding to the hotfoot mouse mutation of the glutamate receptor delta 2, covering part of N2, N3, and N4, impaired both homomeric and heteromeric oligomerization, thus explaining the null-like mouse phenotype. Finally, computer modeling suggested that the dimer interface, largely formed by N1, is highly hydrophobic in GluR3, whereas in GluR6 it contains electrostatic interactions, hence offering an explanation for the subtype assembly specificity conferred by this region. N3, however, is positioned perpendicular to the dimer interface and therefore may be involved in secondary interactions between dimers in the assembled tetrameric receptor.
引用
收藏
页码:15053 / 15060
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   SELECTIVE EXPRESSION OF THE GLUTAMATE-RECEPTOR CHANNEL DELTA-2 SUBUNIT IN CEREBELLAR PURKINJE-CELLS [J].
ARAKI, K ;
MEGURO, H ;
KUSHIYA, E ;
TAKAYAMA, C ;
INOUE, Y ;
MISHINA, M .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1993, 197 (03) :1267-1276
[2]   Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate [J].
Armstrong, N ;
Sun, Y ;
Chen, GQ ;
Gouaux, E .
NATURE, 1998, 395 (6705) :913-917
[3]   Functional assembly of AMPA and kainate receptors is mediated by several discrete protein-protein interactions [J].
Ayalon, G ;
Stern-Bach, Y .
NEURON, 2001, 31 (01) :103-113
[4]  
Dingledine R, 1999, PHARMACOL REV, V51, P7
[5]  
Fischer D, 1999, PROTEINS, P209
[6]   SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling [J].
Guex, N ;
Peitsch, MC .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 1997, 18 (15) :2714-2723
[7]   GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences [J].
Jones, DT .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1999, 287 (04) :797-815
[8]   Hidden Markov models that use predicted local structure for fold recognition: Alphabets of backbone geometry [J].
Karchin, R ;
Cline, M ;
Mandel-Gutfreund, Y ;
Karplus, K .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 51 (04) :504-514
[9]   What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? [J].
Karplus, K ;
Karchin, R ;
Barrett, C ;
Tu, S ;
Cline, M ;
Diekhans, M ;
Grate, L ;
Casper, J ;
Hughey, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2001, :86-91
[10]   Combining local-structure, fold-recognition, and new fold methods for protein structure prediction [J].
Karplus, K ;
Karchin, R ;
Draper, J ;
Casper, J ;
Mandel-Gutfreund, Y ;
Diekhans, M ;
Hughey, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 53 :491-496