Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: An integrative review of the literature

被引:291
作者
Engstrom, JL
Paterson, SA
Doherty, A
Trabulsi, M
Speer, KL
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Maternal Child Nursing, Nurse Midwifery Practitioner Program, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Womens Hlth Nurse Practitioner Program, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Swedish Covenant Hosp, Chicago, IL USA
[4] S Shore Womens Hlth, Scituate, MA USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Program, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
height; weight; self-reported height; self-reported weight; anthropometric measurements;
D O I
10.1016/S1526-9523(03)00281-2
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Height and weight are two of the most commonly used anthropometric measurements in clinical practice and research. Self-reported height and weight measurement is a simple, efficient, inexpensive, and non-invasive method of collecting data from large numbers of people. This integrative review of the published research examined the accuracy of self-reported height and weight measurements in women. Twenty-six studies examined the accuracy of self-reported height in 39,244 women. Twenty-one of the studies found that women overestimate height. Thirty-four studies reviewed the accuracy of self-reported weight in 57,172 women, and all 34 studies reported that women underestimated weight. Although mean variations between self-reported and measured values were small, a significant percentage of women in study groups had very large errors. Inaccurate measurements of both height and weight can cause significant inaccuracies in calculation of body mass index, which is used as a guide for identifying persons at risk for disease. These findings indicate that direct measurement of height and weight should be performed whenever possible for optimal measurements in clinical practice and clinically oriented research. (C) 2003 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 345
页数:8
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[2]  
Bailey K, 2000, AWHONN Lifelines, V4, P41
[3]   Accuracy of self-reported body weight: Stepped Approach Model component assessment [J].
Black, DR ;
Taylor, AM ;
Coster, DC .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (02) :301-307
[4]   Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population [J].
Bolton-Smith, C ;
Woodward, M ;
Tunstall-Pedoe, H ;
Morrison, C .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 54 (02) :143-148
[5]   Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data [J].
Bostrom, G ;
Diderichsen, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 26 (04) :860-866
[6]   Reliability and changes in validity of self-reported cardiovascular disease risk factors using dual response: The behavioral risk factor survey [J].
Bowlin, SJ ;
Morrill, BD ;
Nafziger, AN ;
Lewis, C ;
Pearson, TA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (05) :511-517
[7]   HOW MUCH DO YOU WEIGHT - DETERMINANTS OF VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED BODY-WEIGHT [J].
CASH, TF ;
COUNTS, B ;
HANGEN, J ;
HUFFINE, CE .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1989, 69 (01) :248-250
[8]  
CLINE MG, 1989, HUM BIOL, V61, P415
[9]  
Cooper H.M., 1998, SYNTHESIZING RES GUI, V2
[10]  
DELPRETE LR, 1992, J AM DIET ASSOC, V92, P1483