Does prone positioning reduce small bowel dose in pelvic radiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer?

被引:66
作者
Adli, M
Mayr, NA
Kaiser, HS
Skwarchuk, MW
Meeks, SL
Mardirossian, G
Paulino, AC
Montebello, JF
Gaston, RC
Sorosky, JI
Buatti, JM
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Radiat Oncol Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Emory Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2003年 / 57卷 / 01期
关键词
intensity-modulated radiotherapy; normal tissue dose; bowel complications; patient positioning; gynecologic malignancies; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00409-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been shown to reduce the radiation dose to small bowel in pelvic RT in gynecology patients. Prone positioning has also been used to decrease small bowel dose by displacement of small bowel from the RT field in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the combination of both IMRT and prone positioning on a belly board can reduce small bowel dose further in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing pelvic RT. Methods and Materials: IMRT plans for pelvic RT were computed in 16 patients with gynecologic cancer who had undergone planning CT scans in both the supine and the prone positions on a belly board. For the gross tumor volume, the uterus, cervix, and tumor (or postoperative region) were traced. The clinical target volume was defined as the vessels and lymph nodes from the obturator level to the aortic bifurcation, presacral region, and upper 4 cm of the vagina, in addition to gross tumor volume. The planning target volume was defined as a 2-cm margin in addition to the gross tumor volume and upper 4 cm of the vagina, and 1.5 cm for lymph nodes and vessels. Normal tissue regions of interest included small bowel, large bowel, and bladder. IMRT plans using (1) the limited arc technique (180degrees arc length) and (2) the extended are technique (340degrees arc length) were computed. Dose-volume histograms for normal tissue structures and target were compared between the supine and prone IMRT plans using the paired t test. Results: Prone positioning on a belly board decreased the small bowel dose in gynecologic pelvic IMRT, and the magnitude of improvement depended on the specific IMRT technique used. With the limited arc technique, prone positioning significantly decreased the irradiated small bowel volume at the 25-50-Gy dose levels compared with supine positioning. Small bowel volumes receiving greater than or equal to45 Gy decreased from 19 % to 12.5 % (p = 0.005) with prone positioning. With the extended arc technique, the decrease in irradiated small bowel volume was less marked, but remained detectable in the 35-45-Gy dose levels. Small bowel volumes receiving 2:45 Gy decreased from 13.6% to 10.1% (p = 0.03) with prone positioning. The effect of prone positioning on large bowel and bladder was variable. Large bowel volumes receiving greater than or equal to45 Gy increased with prone positioning from 16.5% to 20.6% (p 0.02) in the limited arc technique and was unaffected in the extended arc technique. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that prone positioning on a belly board can reduce the small bowel dose further in gynecology patients treated with pelvic RT, and that the dose reduction depends on the IMRT technique used. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 238
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   IMPACT OF IMPROVED IRRADIATION TECHNIQUE, AGE, AND LYMPH-NODE SAMPLING ON THE SEVERE COMPLICATION RATE OF SURGICALLY STAGED ENDOMETRIAL CANCER-PATIENTS - A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS [J].
CORN, BW ;
LANCIANO, RM ;
GREVEN, KM ;
NOUMOFF, J ;
SCHULTZ, D ;
HANKS, GE ;
FOWBLE, BL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (03) :510-515
[2]   Efficacy of a belly board device with CT-simulation in reducing small bowel volume within pelvic irradiation fields [J].
Das, IJ ;
Lanciano, RM ;
Movsas, B ;
Kagawa, K ;
Barnes, SJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (01) :67-76
[3]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[4]  
Fu Y T, 1995, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V7, P188, DOI 10.1016/S0936-6555(05)80514-X
[5]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF TREATMENT TECHNIQUES TO MINIMIZE THE VOLUME OF PELVIC SMALL-BOWEL WITH REDUCTION OF ACUTE AND LATE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH PELVIC IRRADIATION [J].
GALLAGHER, MJ ;
BRERETON, HD ;
ROSTOCK, RA ;
ZERO, JM ;
ZEKOSKI, DA ;
POYSS, LF ;
RICHTER, MP ;
KLIGERMAN, MM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (09) :1565-1573
[6]  
Grigsby PW, 2002, ONCOLOGY-NY, V16, P777
[7]  
International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements, 1993, 50 ICRU
[8]   Influence of patient positioning on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder in patients receiving pelvic irradiation: A prospective study using a 3D planning system and a radiobiological model [J].
Koelbl, O ;
Richter, S ;
Flentje, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05) :1193-1198
[9]   Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer [J].
Landoni, F ;
Maneo, A ;
Colombo, A ;
Placa, F ;
Milani, R ;
Perego, P ;
Favini, G ;
Ferri, L ;
Mangioni, C .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9077) :535-540
[10]   DOSE-VOLUME CORRELATION IN RADIATION-RELATED LATE SMALL-BOWEL COMPLICATIONS - A CLINICAL-STUDY [J].
LETSCHERT, JGJ ;
LEBESQUE, JV ;
DEBOER, RW ;
HART, AAM ;
BARTELINK, H .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1990, 18 (04) :307-320