Late complications following permanent pacemaker implantation or elective unit replacement

被引:110
作者
Harcombe, AA
Newell, SA
Ludman, PF
Wistow, TE
Sharples, LD
Schofield, PM
Stone, DL
Shapiro, LM
Cole, T
Petch, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] Papworth Hosp, Reg Cardiac Unit, NHS Trust, Cambridge CB3 8RE, England
[2] Papworth Hosp, MRC, NHS Trust, Biostat Unit,Res & Dev Unit, Cambridge CB3 8RE, England
关键词
permanent pacemaker; elective unit; replacement; late complications; arrhythmias;
D O I
10.1136/hrt.80.3.240
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective-To determine the rate of late complications following first implantation or elective unit replacement of a permanent pacemaker system. Design-Analysis of pacemaker data and complications prospectively acquired on a computerised database. Complications were studied over an 11 year period from January 1984 to December 1993. Setting-Tertiary referral cardiothoracic centre. Patients-Records of 2621 patients were analysed retrospectively. Main outcome measures-Complications requiring repeat procedures occurring more than six weeks after pacemaker implantation or elective unit replacement. Results-The overall rate of late complications was significantly lower after first implantation of a permanent pacemaker (34 cases, complication rate 1.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.9% to 1.9%) than after elective unit replacement (16 cases, complication rate 6.5% (3.3% to 9.7%). There were 20 cases of erosion, 18 infections, five electrode problems, and seven miscellaneous problems. Complications were more common with inexperienced operators (18.9% (6.0% to 31.8%)) than with experienced operators (0.9% (0.3% to 1.5%)). Conclusions-The incidence of late complications following pacemaker implantation is low and compares favourably with early complication rates. The majority are caused by erosion and infection. Patients who have undergone elective unit replacement are at particular risk.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 244
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
AGGARWAL RK, 1995, BRIT HEART J, V73, P571
[2]   Survey of cardiac pacing and defibrillation in the United States in 1993 [J].
Bernstein, AD ;
Parsonnet, V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 (02) :187-196
[3]   EARLY COMPLICATIONS AFTER DUAL-CHAMBER VERSUS SINGLE CHAMBER PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION [J].
CHAUHAN, A ;
GRACE, AA ;
NEWELL, SA ;
STONE, DL ;
SHAPIRO, LM ;
SCHOFIELD, PM ;
PETCH, MC .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (11) :2012-2015
[4]   PERMANENT PACEMAKER INFECTIONS - CHARACTERIZATION AND MANAGEMENT [J].
CHOO, MH ;
HOLMES, DR ;
GERSH, BJ ;
MALONEY, JD ;
MERIDETH, J ;
PLUTH, JR ;
TRUSTY, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1981, 48 (03) :559-564
[5]   SURGICAL REMOVAL OF INFECTED TRANSVENOUS PACEMAKER LEADS [J].
FRAME, R ;
BRODMAN, RF ;
FURMAN, S ;
ANDREWS, CA ;
GROSS, JN .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (12) :2343-2348
[6]  
GRIFFITH MJ, 1994, BRIT HEART J, V71, P202
[7]  
HALL JA, 1993, EUR J CARDIAC PACING, V3, P14
[8]   COMPLICATIONS OF PERMANENT TRANSVENOUS CARDIAC PACING - A 14-YEAR REVIEW OF ALL TRANSVENOUS PACEMAKERS INSERTED AT ONE COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL [J].
HILL, PE .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 10 (03) :564-570
[9]  
MATSUURA Y, 1990, Hiroshima Journal of Medical Sciences, V39, P131
[10]  
MOUNSEY JP, 1994, BRIT HEART J, V72, P339