Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy using a dedicated unit

被引:42
作者
Meyer, JE
Christian, RL
Lester, SC
Frenna, TH
Denison, CM
DiPiro, PJ
Polger, M
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP,SCH MED,DEPT SURG,BOSTON,MA 02115
[2] HARVARD UNIV,BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP,SCH MED,DEPT PATHOL,BOSTON,MA 02115
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659367
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. In our institution for the past ii years, stereotaxic core breast biopsy using a 14-gauge needle has been offered as an alternative to surgical excision. The purpose of this paper is to describe our protocol, results, and lessons learned from our experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From August 1991 to July 1995, 388 stereotaxic needle core biopsies of clinically occult, noncalcified, mammographically detected solid masses were performed, In this group, 103 patients underwent subsequent surgical excision. Another 169 have had follow-up examinations 1 year or more after their biopsies. RESULTS. Of the 61 patients diagnosed with a malignant process on core biopsy, all had confirmation on subsequent surgical excision. Forty-one of the 42 core biopsies that showed a benign process were subsequently confirmed on surgical excision, One patient with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy had ductal carcinoma in situ on surgical excision, Patients with 169 benign masses on core biopsy have been followed for at least 1 year by mammography, Of these women, 110 have been followed for at least 2 years, and no malignant lesions have been found. CONCLUSION. Stereotaxic large-needle core biopsy appears to be an accurate alternative to surgical excision for evaluating a solid breast mass, However, the mammographic appearance, technical quality of the biopsy, and pathologic findings in each patient must be correlated to ensure the highest possible accuracy when using this technique.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 182
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] STEREOTACTIC FINE-NEEDLE BIOPSY IN 2594 MAMMOGRAPHICALLY DETECTED NON-PALPABLE LESIONS
    AZAVEDO, E
    SVANE, G
    AUER, G
    [J]. LANCET, 1989, 1 (8646) : 1033 - 1036
  • [2] NONPALPABLE LESIONS DETECTED WITH MAMMOGRAPHY - REVIEW OF 512 CONSECUTIVE CASES
    CIATTO, S
    CATALIOTTI, L
    DISTANTE, V
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 165 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [3] NONPALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS - CORRELATION OF STEREOTAXIC LARGE-CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY AND SURGICAL BIOPSY RESULTS
    ELVECROG, EL
    LECHNER, MC
    NELSON, MT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (02) : 453 - 455
  • [4] NONPALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BIOPSY BASED ON SUSPICION OF CARCINOMA AT MAMMOGRAPHY
    HALL, FM
    STORELLA, JM
    SILVERSTONE, DZ
    WYSHAK, G
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (02) : 353 - 358
  • [5] MALIGNANT SEEDING OF THE NEEDLE TRACK DURING STEREOTAXIC CORE NEEDLE BREAST BIOPSY
    HARTER, LP
    CURTIS, JS
    PONTO, G
    CRAIG, PH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (03) : 713 - 714
  • [6] STEREOTAXIC LARGE-CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY OF 450 NONPALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS WITH SURGICAL CORRELATION IN LESIONS WITH CANCER OR ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA
    JACKMAN, RJ
    NOWELS, KW
    SHEPARD, MJ
    FINKELSTEIN, SI
    MARZONI, FA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [7] DOES PREOPERATIVE NEEDLE LOCALIZATION LEAD TO AN INCREASE IN LOCAL BREAST-CANCER RECURRENCE
    KOPANS, DB
    GALLAGHER, WJ
    SWANN, CA
    MCCARTHY, KA
    WHITE, G
    HALL, DA
    WOOD, WC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (03) : 667 - 668
  • [8] IMPACT OF STEREOTAXIC CORE BREAST BIOPSY ON COST OF DIAGNOSIS
    LIBERMAN, L
    FAHS, MC
    DERSHAW, DD
    BONACCIO, E
    ABRAMSON, AF
    COHEN, MA
    HANN, LE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) : 633 - 637
  • [9] STEREOTAXIC CORE BIOPSY OF BREAST-CARCINOMA - ACCURACY AT PREDICTING INVASION
    LIBERMAN, L
    DERSHAW, DD
    ROSEN, PP
    GIESS, CS
    COHEN, MA
    ABRAMSON, AF
    HANN, LE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (02) : 379 - 381
  • [10] NEEDLE CORE BIOPSY GUIDED WITH MAMMOGRAPHY - A STUDY OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS
    LINDFORS, KK
    ROSENQUIST, CJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) : 217 - 222