Expectations from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence processing

被引:59
作者
Brown, Meredith [1 ]
Salverda, Anne Pier [1 ]
Dilley, Laura C. [2 ]
Tanenhaus, Michael K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Prosody; Expectations; Spoken-word recognition; Lexical competition; Perceptual organization; Visual-world paradigm; WORD SEGMENTATION; COMPREHENSION; INFORMATION; MODEL; PITCH;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-011-0167-9
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Previous work examining prosodic cues in online spoken-word recognition has focused primarily on local cues to word identity. However, recent studies have suggested that utterance-level prosodic patterns can also influence the interpretation of subsequent sequences of lexically ambiguous syllables (Dilley, Mattys, & Vinke, Journal of Memory and Language, 63:274-294, 2010; Dilley & McAuley, Journal of Memory and Language, 59:294-311, 2008). To test the hypothesis that these distal prosody effects are based on expectations about the organization of upcoming material, we conducted a visual-world experiment. We examined fixations to competing alternatives such as pan and panda upon hearing the target word panda in utterances in which the acoustic properties of the preceding sentence material had been manipulated. The proportions of fixations to the monosyllabic competitor were higher beginning 200 ms after target word onset when the preceding prosody supported a prosodic constituent boundary following pan-, rather than following panda. These findings support the hypothesis that expectations based on perceived prosodic patterns in the distal context influence lexical segmentation and word recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1196
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Music, Language and the Brain
[2]  
Boersma P., 2010, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC
[3]  
Couper-Kuhlen E., 1993, English speech rhythm : Form and function in everyday verbal interaction
[4]  
Crystal D., 1969, Prosodic systems and intonation in English
[5]  
Dainora Audra, 2001, THESIS U CHICAGO
[6]   Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing [J].
Dilley, Laura C. ;
McAuley, J. Devin .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (03) :294-311
[7]   Altering Context Speech Rate Can Cause Words to Appear or Disappear [J].
Dilley, Laura C. ;
Pitt, Mark A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (11) :1664-1670
[8]   Potent prosody: Comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation [J].
Dilley, Laura C. ;
Mattys, Sven L. ;
Vinke, Louis .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 63 (03) :274-294
[9]  
Fraundorf S., 2010, ARCH MECH LANG PROC
[10]  
Handel S., 1989, LISTENING INTRO PERC, DOI DOI 10.2307/898748