Public ocean literacy in the United States

被引:166
作者
Steel, BS [1 ]
Smith, C
Opsommer, L
Curiel, S
Warner-Steel, R
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Master Publ Policy Program, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[4] Oregon State Univ, Dept Biol, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2005.01.002
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The 2004 Pew Ocean Commission report suggests a need to improve public literacy about oceans. The authors of the report assume that enhancing public awareness and knowledge of oceans will lead to increased public support for ocean restoration efforts. Following this line of reasoning, our study investigates current levels of public knowledge and informedness concerning oceans, and also explores the correlates of knowledge holding. Using data gathered from a national random sample of 1233 citizens in Summer/Fall 2003, two hypotheses-trans-situational and situation-specific-are examined as explanations of public knowledge levels concerning ocean policy issues. The trans-situational hypothesis evaluates socioeconomic status (SES) as an explanation for levels of knowledge. The situation-specific hypothesis evaluates personal experiences and contexts that might overcome SES characteristics. We also examine the effect of information source use on knowledge holding. Findings suggest that both trans-situational and situation-specific hypotheses are useful in explaining knowledge levels. We also find that information sources, such as newspapers and the internet, are likely to improve citizen knowledge on ocean issues, while television and radio have a negative effect. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 114
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FUTURE US OCEAN POLI
[2]  
BARRINGER F, 2004, NY TIMES 0421, pA15
[3]  
Beierle T.C. Cayford., 2002, Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions
[4]   The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism [J].
Bimber, B .
POLITY, 1998, 31 (01) :133-160
[5]   Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials TV news, and newspapers [J].
Brians, CL ;
Wattenberg, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 40 (01) :172-193
[6]  
Carpini MXD., 1996, WHAT AM KNOW POLITIC, DOI DOI 10.12987/9780300194319
[7]  
Dahl Robert, 1985, Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy versus Guardianship
[8]  
Daigle D, 2003, VALUES AT SEA, P230
[9]   Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale [J].
Dunlap, RE ;
Van Liere, KD ;
Mertig, AG ;
Jones, RE .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2000, 56 (03) :425-442
[10]  
Eagly A. H., 1997, ENV ETHICS BEHAV PSY, P122