Clinical Evaluation of a Fully Synthetic Middle Meatal Stent for Safety and Tolerability

被引:4
作者
Catalano, Peter J. [1 ]
Payne, Spencer [2 ]
Thong, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] St Elizabeths Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Brighton, MA 02135 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
middle meatal; dressing; stent; poly-urethane; synthetic; endoscopic sinus surgery; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; BIOMATERIALS; FLOSEAL(TM); PACKING;
D O I
10.1177/0194599810393870
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of a novel, fully synthetic, poly-urethane middle meatal dressing after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Study Design. Case series with planned data collection. Setting. Tertiary care medical facility. Subjects and Methods. In total, 104 patients with medically refractory chronic rhinosinusitis were treated with patient-appropriate ESS and a poly-urethane sponge placed into their middle meatus at the end of operation, giving a total of 173 middle meatus stent placements. Patients were then assessed immediately postoperatively and 2, 6, 12, and 16 weeks after surgery for adverse systemic or local reaction to the stent and the incidence of postoperative infections. Results. There was no pain or allergic reaction encountered with this new material. There were 11 middle meati (6.4%; 95% confidence interval, 3.2%-11.1%) with postoperative infection at 2 weeks follow-up. There were no other stent-related local reactions (ie, excessive bleeding, middle meatal synechia, or granulation) up to 16 weeks postoperatively. Residual middle meatal stent material was either absent or negligible at 2 weeks postoperatively. Conclusions. This first fully synthetic poly-urethane middle meatal dressing used during ESS demonstrated excellent biocompatibility and safety. The incidence of localized postoperative infection was also low.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 456
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Baumann A, 2003, RHINOLOGY, V41, P244
[2]   Evaluation of middle meatal stenting after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST) [J].
Catalano, PJ ;
Roffman, EJ .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 128 (06) :875-881
[3]   Long-term effects of FloSealTM packing after endoscopic sinus surgery [J].
Chandra, RK ;
Conley, DB ;
Haines, GK ;
Kern, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) :240-243
[4]   The effect of FloSeal on mucosal healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: A comparison with thrombin-soaked gelatin foam [J].
Chandra, RK ;
Conley, DB ;
Kern, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2003, 17 (01) :51-55
[5]   A COMPARISON OF PACKING MATERIALS USED IN NASAL SURGERY [J].
GARTH, RJN ;
BRIGHTWELL, AP .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1994, 108 (07) :564-566
[6]   MeroGel hyaluronic acid sinonasal implants: Osteogenic implications [J].
Jacob, A ;
Faddis, BT ;
Chole, RA .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (01) :37-42
[7]   Effects of topically applied biomaterials on paranasal sinus mucosal healing [J].
Maccabee, MS ;
Trune, DR ;
Hwang, PH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :203-207
[8]   The effect of a dissolvable hyaluronic acid-based pack on the healing of the nasal mucosa of sheep [J].
McIntosh, D ;
Cowin, A ;
Adams, D ;
Rayner, T ;
Wormald, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) :85-90
[9]   Safety in endoscopic sinus surgery [J].
McMains, K. Christopher .
CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2008, 16 (03) :247-251
[10]   Composition of hyaluronan affects wound healing in the rabbit maxillary sinus [J].
Proctor, M ;
Proctor, K ;
Shu, XZ ;
McGill, LD ;
Prestwich, GD ;
Orlandi, RR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) :206-211