Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies

被引:205
作者
Palmer, K [1 ]
Burtraw, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
renewable energy; electricity; renewable portfolio standard; carbon dioxide;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2005.09.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze policies to promote renewable sources of electricity. A portfolio standard (RPS) raises electricity prices and primarily reduces gas-fired generation. A knee of the Cost Curve exists between 15% and 20% goals for 2020 in our central case, and higher natural gas prices lower the cost of greater reliance on renewables. A renewable energy production tax credit lowers electricity price at the expense of taxpayers, which limits its effectiveness in reducing carbon emissions, and it is less cost-effective at increasing renewables than a portfolio standard. Neither policy is as cost-effective as a cap-and-trade policy for achieving carbon emission reductions. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 894
页数:22
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING [J].
ARROW, KJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) :155-173
[2]  
BANZHAF S, 2004, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V26, P17
[3]  
BERNOW S, 1997, ELECT J MAY
[4]  
BOLINGER M, 2003, COMPARISON AEO 2004
[5]  
Burtraw D., 2001, EFFECT ALLOWANCE ALL, V1
[6]  
CLEMMER S, 1999, POWERFUL OPPORTUNITY
[7]  
DARMSTADTER J, 2003, EC POLICY SETTING RE, V3
[8]  
*EN MOD FOR, 2001, PRIC EM RESTR EL MAR, V17
[9]  
*EN MOD FOR, 1998, COMP EL IND, V15
[10]  
*EN RES CTR NETH, 2004, REN EN FACT SHEETS E