Comparison of rigidity and connectivity percolation in two dimensions

被引:56
作者
Moukarzel, C [1 ]
Duxbury, PM
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, Inst Fis, BR-24210340 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Fundamental Mat Res, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevE.59.2614
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Using a recently developed algorithm for generic rigidity of two-dimensional graphs, we analyze rigidity and connectivity percolation transitions in two dimensions on lattices of linear size up to L = 4096. We compare three different universality classes: the generic rigidity class, the connectivity class, and the generic "braced square net''(GBSN). We analyze the spanning cluster density P-proportional to, the backbone density P-B, and the density of dangling ends P-D. In the generic rigidity (GR) and connectivity cases, the lend-carrying component of the spanning cluster, the backbone, is fractal at p(c), so that the backbone density behaves as B similar to (p - p(c))(beta') for p > p(c). We estimate beta(gr)' = 0.25 +/- 0.02 for generic rigidity and beta(c)' = 0.467 +/- 0.007 for the connectivity case. We find the correlation length exponents v(gr) = 1.16 +/- 0.03 for generic rigidity compared to the exact value for connectivity, v(c) = 4/3. In contrast the GBSN undergoes a first-order rigidity transition, with the backbone density being extensive at p(c), and undergoing a jump discontinuity on reducing p across the transition. We define a model which tunes continuously between the GBSN and GR classes. and show that the GR class is typical. [S1063-651X(99)12102-0].
引用
收藏
页码:2614 / 2622
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] MECHANICS OF DISORDERED SOLIDS .1. PERCOLATION ON ELASTIC NETWORKS WITH CENTRAL FORCES
    ARBABI, S
    SAHIMI, M
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1993, 47 (02): : 695 - 702
  • [2] HOW TO BRACE A ONE-STORY BUILDING
    BOLKER, ED
    CRAPO, H
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1977, 4 (02) : 125 - 152
  • [3] Born M., 1954, DYNAMICAL THEORY CRY
  • [4] Bunde A., 1991, FRACTALS DISORDERED
  • [5] CHAKRAVARTY N, 1986, STRUCTURAL TOPOLOGY, V12, P11
  • [6] THERMAL PHASE-TRANSITION OF THE DILUTE S-STATE POTTS AND N-VECTOR MODELS AT THE PERCOLATION-THRESHOLD
    CONIGLIO, A
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1981, 46 (04) : 250 - 253
  • [7] CLUSTER STRUCTURE NEAR THE PERCOLATION-THRESHOLD
    CONIGLIO, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1982, 15 (12): : 3829 - 3844
  • [8] Crapo H., 1979, STRUCTURAL TOPOLOGY, V1, P26
  • [9] RIGID BACKBONE - A NEW GEOMETRY FOR PERCOLATION
    DAY, AR
    TREMBLAY, RR
    TREMBLAY, AMS
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1986, 56 (23) : 2501 - 2504
  • [10] DEGENNES PG, 1976, J PHYS LETT-PARIS, V37, pL1, DOI 10.1051/jphyslet:019760037010100