Machine perfusion preservation of the non-heart- beating donor rat livers using polysol, a new preservation solution

被引:26
作者
Bessems, M [1 ]
Doorschodt, BM [1 ]
van Vliet, AK [1 ]
van Gulik, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Surg Lab, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.01.039
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Aims. The increasing shortage of donor organs has led to a focus on extended criteria donors, including the non-heart-beating donor (NHBD). An optimal preservation method is required to facilitate successful transplantation of these ischemically damaged organs. The recent literature has shown clear advantages of hypothermic machine perfusion (MP) over cold storage (CS). For NIP, modified University of Wisconsin perfusion solution (UW-G) is often used, which, however, is known to cause microcirculatory obstruction, is difficult to obtain, and is expensive. Therefore, Polysol was developed as a MP preservation solution that contains specific nutrients for the liver, such as amino acids, energy substrates, and vitamins. The aim of this study was to compare Polysol with UW-G in a NHBD rat liver model. Methods. After 24 hours hypothermic MP of NHBD rat livers using UW-G or Polysol, liver damage and function parameters were assessed during 60 minutes of reperfusion with Krebs-Henseleit buffer. Control livers were reperfused after 24 hours CS in UW. Results. Liver enzyme release was significantly higher among the CS-UW group compared to NIP using UW-G or Polysol. Flow during reperfusion was significantly higher when using Polysol compared to UW-G. Bile production and ammonia clearance were highest when using Polysol compared to UW-G. There was less cellular edema after preservation with Polysol compared to UW-G. Conclusions. MP of NHBD rat livers for 24 hours using UW-G or Polysol resulted in less hepatocellular damage than CS in UW. MP of NHBD livers for 24 hours using Polysol is superior to NIP using UW-G.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 328
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] BESSEMS M, 2003, GUT S6, V52, pA160
  • [2] Liver transplantation from controlled non-heart-beating donors
    D'Alessandro, AM
    Hoffmann, RM
    Knechtle, SJ
    Odorico, JS
    Becker, YT
    Musat, A
    Pirsch, JD
    Sollinger, HW
    Kalayoglu, M
    [J]. SURGERY, 2000, 128 (04) : 579 - 586
  • [3] RETRACTED: Pulsatile machine perfusion with vasosol solution improves early graft function after cadaveric renal transplantation (Retracted Article. See vol 79, pg 1774, 2005)
    Guarrera, JV
    Polyak, M
    Arrington, BO
    Kapur, S
    Stubenbord, WT
    Kinkhabwala, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (08) : 1264 - 1268
  • [4] KOOTSTRA G, 1995, TRANSPLANT P, V27, P2893
  • [5] Survival transplantation of preserved non-heartbeating donor rat livers: Preservation by hypothermic machine perfusion
    Lee, CY
    Jain, S
    Duncan, HM
    Zhang, JX
    Jones, JW
    Southard, JH
    Clemens, MG
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (10) : 1432 - 1436
  • [6] Long-term outcome of controlled, non-heart-beating donor liver transplantation
    Manzarbeitia, CY
    Ortiz, JA
    Jeon, H
    Rothstein, KD
    Martinez, O
    Araya, VR
    Munoz, SJ
    Reich, DJ
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (02) : 211 - 215
  • [7] Hyperaggregating effect of hydroxyethyl starch components and University of Wisconsin solution on human red blood cells: A risk of impaired graft perfusion in organ procurement?
    Morariu, AM
    Van der Plaats, A
    Oeveren, WV
    'T Hart, NA
    Leuvenink, HGD
    Graaff, R
    Ploeg, RJ
    Rakhorst, G
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [8] Kupffer cell activation in liver preservation: Cold storage vs machine perfusion
    Southard, JH
    Lindell, S
    Ametani, M
    Richer, JP
    Vos, AWF
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 32 (01) : 27 - 28
  • [9] Preservation of non-heart-beating donor kidneys:: A clinical prospective randomised case-control study of machine perfusion versus cold storage
    van der Vliet, JA
    Kievit, JK
    Héné, RJ
    Hilbrands, LB
    Kootstra, G
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 847 - 847
  • [10] Wight J, 2003, Health Technol Assess, V7, P1