Validation of the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status and Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment Against Detailed Cognitive Testing and Clinical Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment After Stroke

被引:76
作者
Zietemann, Vera [1 ]
Kopczak, Anna [1 ]
Mueller, Claudia [1 ]
Wollenweber, Frank Arne [1 ]
Dichgans, Martin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Stroke & Dementia Res, Klinikum Univ Munchen, Feodor Lynen Str 17, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] German Ctr Neurodegenerat Dis DZNE, Munich, Germany
[3] Munich Cluster Syst Neurol SyNergy, Munich, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
mild cognitive impairment; ROC curve; stroke; Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status; Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment; validation; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL BATTERY; HARMONIZATION STANDARDS; NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS; NATIONAL INSTITUTE; CANADIAN STROKE; STATUS TICS; DEMENTIA; VALIDITY; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017519
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Background and Purpose-Assessment of cognitive status poststroke is recommended by guidelines but follow-up can often not be done in person. The Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) and the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) are considered useful screening instruments. Yet, evidence to define optimal cut-offs for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) after stroke is limited. Methods-We studied 105 patients enrolled in the prospective DEDEMAS study (Determinants of Dementia After Stroke; NCT01334749). Follow-up visits at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months included comprehensive neuropsychological testing and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale, both of which served as reference standards. The original TICS and T-MoCA were obtained in 2 separate telephone interviews each separated from the personal visits by 1 week (1 before and 1 after the visit) with the order of interviews (TICS versus T-MoCA) alternating between subjects. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves was determined. Results-Ninety-six patients completed both the face-to-face visits and the 2 interviews. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves ranged between 0.76 and 0.83 for TICS and between 0.73 and 0.94 for T-MoCA depending on MCI definition. For multidomain MCI defined by multiple-tests definition derived from comprehensive neuropsychological testing optimal sensitivities and specificities were achieved at cut-offs <36 (TICS) and <18 (T-MoCA). Validity was lower using single-test definition, and cut-offs were higher compared with multiple-test definitions. Using Clinical Dementia Rating as the reference, optimal cut-offs for MCI were <36 (TICS) and approximately 19 (T-MoCA). Conclusions-Both the TICS and T-MoCA are valid screening tools poststroke, particularly for multidomain MCI using multiple-test definition.
引用
收藏
页码:2952 / +
页数:20
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Validity of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) in post-stroke subjects [J].
Barber, M ;
Stott, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 19 (01) :75-79
[2]
Global clinical dementia rating of 0.5 in MCI masks variability related to level of function [J].
Chang, Y. -L. ;
Bondi, M. W. ;
McEvoy, L. K. ;
Fennema-Notestine, C. ;
Salmon, D. P. ;
Galasko, D. ;
Hagler, D. J., Jr. ;
Dale, A. M. .
NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (07) :652-659
[3]
THE TELEPHONE INTERVIEW FOR COGNITIVE STATUS (TICS) - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY IN A STROKE SAMPLE [J].
DESMOND, DW ;
TATEMICHI, TK ;
HANZAWA, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 9 (10) :803-807
[4]
Vascular Cognitive Impairment [J].
Dichgans, Martin ;
Leys, Didier .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2017, 120 (03) :573-591
[5]
Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [J].
Gorelick, Philip B. ;
Scuteri, Angelo ;
Black, Sandra E. ;
DeCarli, Charles ;
Greenberg, Steven M. ;
Iadecola, Costantino ;
Launer, Lenore J. ;
Laurent, Stephane ;
Lopez, Oscar L. ;
Nyenhuis, David ;
Petersen, Ronald C. ;
Schneider, Julie A. ;
Tzourio, Christophe ;
Arnett, Donna K. ;
Bennett, David A. ;
Chui, Helena C. ;
Higashida, Randall T. ;
Lindquist, Ruth ;
Nilsson, Peter M. ;
Roman, Gustavo C. ;
Sellke, Frank W. ;
Seshadri, Sudha .
STROKE, 2011, 42 (09) :2672-2713
[6]
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards [J].
Hachinski, Vladimir ;
Iadecola, Costantino ;
Petersen, Ron C. ;
Breteler, Monique M. ;
Nyenhuis, David L. ;
Black, Sandra E. ;
Powers, William J. ;
DeCarli, Charles ;
Merino, Jose G. ;
Kalaria, Raj N. ;
Vinters, Harry V. ;
Holtzman, David M. ;
Rosenberg, Gary A. ;
Dichgans, Martin ;
Marler, John R. ;
Leblanc, Gabrielle G. .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (09) :2220-2241
[7]
Neuropsychological Criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Risk in the Framingham Heart Study [J].
Jak, Amy J. ;
Preis, Sarah R. ;
Beiser, Alexa S. ;
Seshadri, Sudha ;
Wolf, Philip A. ;
Bondi, Mark W. ;
Au, Rhoda .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 22 (09) :937-943
[9]
Test Accuracy of Cognitive Screening Tests for Diagnosis of Dementia and Multidomain Cognitive Impairment in Stroke [J].
Lees, Rosalind ;
Selvarajah, Johann ;
Fenton, Candida ;
Pendlebury, Sarah T. ;
Langhorne, Peter ;
Stott, David J. ;
Quinn, Terence J. .
STROKE, 2014, 45 (10) :3008-+
[10]
Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [J].
Lopez, Oscar L. ;
Kuller, Lewis H. .
NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (01) :63-64