The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load

被引:81
作者
Tellinghuisen, DJ [1 ]
Nowak, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Calvin Coll, Dept Psychol, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 USA
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 2003年 / 65卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03194817
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Using a response competition paradigm, we investigated the ability to ignore target response compatible, target response-incompatible, and neutral visual and auditory distractors presented during a visual search task. The perceptual load model of attention (e.g., Lavie & Tsal, 1994) states that task-relevant processing load determines irrelevant distractor processing in such a way that increasing processing load prevents distractor processing. In three experiments, participants searched sets of one (easy search) or six (hard search) similar items. In Experiment 1, visual distractors influenced reaction time (RT) and accuracy only for easy searches, following the perceptual load model. Surprisingly, auditory distractors yielded larger distractor compatibility effects (median RT for incompatible trials minus median RT for compatible trials) for hard searches than for easy searches. In Experiments 2 and 3, during hard searches, consistent RT benefits with response-compatible and RT costs with response-incompatible auditory distractors occurred only for hard searches. We suggest that auditory distractors are processed regardless of visual perceptual load but that the ability to inhibit cross-modal influence from auditory distractors is reduced under high visual load.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 828
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Crossmodal attention [J].
Driver, J ;
Spence, C .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1998, 8 (02) :245-253
[2]  
DRIVER J, 1989, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V15, P304
[3]   Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities [J].
Duncan, J ;
Martens, S ;
Ward, R .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6635) :808-810
[4]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[5]  
FOLK CL, 1992, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V18, P1030, DOI 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1030
[6]   Interference from multi-dimensional objects during feature and conjunction discriminations [J].
Fournier, LR ;
Bowd, C ;
Herbert, RJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01) :191-209
[7]   Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: Event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection [J].
Handy, TC ;
Soltani, M ;
Mangun, GR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (03) :213-218
[8]   Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load [J].
Handy, TC ;
Mangun, GR .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (01) :175-186
[9]  
Kahneman D, 1973, ATTENTION EFFORT
[10]   PERCEPTUAL LOAD AS A MAJOR DETERMINANT OF THE LOCUS OF SELECTION IN VISUAL-ATTENTION [J].
LAVIE, N ;
TSAL, Y .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 56 (02) :183-197