Diagnostic accuracy of a bedside D-dimer assay and alveolar dead-space measurement for rapid exclusion of pulmonary embolism - A multicenter study

被引:86
作者
Kline, JA [1 ]
Israel, EG
Michelson, EA
O'Neil, BJ
Plewa, MC
Portelli, DC
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Barnes Hosp, Div Emergency Med, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Detroit, MI USA
[5] St Vincent Mercy Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Toledo, OH USA
[6] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2001年 / 285卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.285.6.761
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context A previous study suggested that the combination of a normal D-dimer assay and normal alveolar dead-space fraction is a highly sensitive screening test for pulmonary embolism (PE). Objective To determine if the combination of a normal alveolar dead-space fraction (volume of alveolar dead space/tidal volume less than or equal to 20%) and a normal whole-blood agglutination D-dimer assay can exclude PE in emergency department (ED) patients. Design Prospective, noninterventional study conducted in 1998-1999, Study data were obtained prior to standard testing for PE, consisting of radionuclide lung scanning or contrast-enhanced computed tomography and 6-month follow-up plus selective use of venous ultrasonography and pulmonary angiography. Imaging studies were interpreted by blinded observers. Setting Six urban teaching hospitals in the United States. Patients A total of 380 hemodynamically stable ED patients aged 18 years or older with suspected acute PE. Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity and specificity for PE with a positive test defined as having either alveolar dead-space fraction or D-dimer assay results abnormal. Alveolar dead-space fraction was determined by subtracting airway dead space from physiological dead space (determined using the modified Bohr equation) and D-dimer assay, assayed at bedside using 20 muL of arterial blood. Results Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 64 patients (16.8%), of those 20 had an abnormal D-dimer assay result, 3 had an abnormal alveolar dead-space fraction, 40 had abnormal results in both, and 1 had normal results for both tests. The sensitivity for diagnosis of PE was 98.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.6%-100.0%). Among the 316 patients without PE, both D-dimer and dead-space results were normal in 163, for a specificity of 51.6% (95% CI, 46.1%-57.1%). Posterior probability of PE with normal results on both tests was 0.75% (95% CI, 0%-3.4%). Conclusion In this multicenter study of ED patients, a normal D-dimer assay result plus a normal alveolar dead-space fraction was associated with a low prevalence of PE.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 768
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条