Maximising sustainability of Dutch dairy farming systems for different stakeholders: A modelling approach

被引:29
作者
van Calker, K. J. [1 ,2 ]
Berentsen, P. B. M. [1 ]
Giesen, G. W. J. [1 ]
Huirne, R. B. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Business Econ Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Agr Econ Res Inst, NL-2502 LS The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
dairy farming; sustainability; modelling; Weighted Goal Programming; stakeholders; Multi-Attribute Utility Theory;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A multi-attribute sustainability function is included into a dairy farm LP-model by using Weighted Goal Programming. The created Weighted Linear Goal Programming (WLGP)-model is used to maximise sustainability of different Dutch dairy fanning systems and to analyse the impact of. (1) maximisation of individual sustainability aspects (economic, social and ecological sustainability) and (2) maximisation of overall sustainability using references stakeholder Maximising the individual aspects of both dairy farming systems, i.e. conventional and organic, shows the trade-offs between different aspects of sustainability. For conventional as well as organic dairy farming maximum scores are highest for external social sustainability. The conventional dairy farm achieves a slightly higher score for overall sustainability than the organic dairy farm for all stakeholders (i.e. consumers and producers). This shows that it is possible for conventional dairy farms, similar to the conventional farm used in the analysis especially regarding the stocking density and under Dutch policy conditions, to achieve equal sustainability scores in comparison with organic dairy farms. it is concluded that the WLGP model is a suitable tool to analyse the sustainability of different dairy farming systems. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 419
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Ground water recharge through optimized intensive dairy farms [J].
Aarts, HFM ;
Habekotté, B ;
van Keulen, H .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (03) :738-743
[2]  
BAARS T, 1993, MOGELIJKHEDEN RODE K
[3]   AN ENVIRONMENTAL-ECONOMIC MODEL AT FARM-LEVEL TO ANALYZE INSTITUTIONAL AND TECHNICAL CHANGE IN DAIRY FARMING [J].
BERENTSEN, PBM ;
GIESEN, GWJ .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1995, 49 (02) :153-175
[4]   Conversion from conventional to biological dairy farming: Economic and environmental consequences at farm level [J].
Berentsen, PBM ;
Giesen, GWJ ;
Schneiders, MMFH .
BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 1998, 16 (03) :311-328
[5]  
EVERS AG, 2004, KOSTPRIJSVERSCHIL TU
[6]   A simulation of Johne's disease control [J].
Groenendaal, H ;
Nielen, M ;
Jalvingh, AW ;
Horst, SH ;
Galligan, DT ;
Hesselink, JW .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2002, 54 (03) :225-245
[7]   Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems [J].
Halberg, N ;
van der Werf, HMG ;
Basset-Mens, C ;
Dalgaard, R ;
de Boer, IJM .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2005, 96 (01) :33-50
[8]  
Hardaker J. B., 1997, COPING RISK AGR
[9]  
Heinen J. T., 1994, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, V1, P22
[10]   Bio-economic evaluation of dairy farm management scenarios using integrated simulation and multiple-criteria models [J].
Herrero, M ;
Fawcett, RH ;
Dent, JB .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1999, 62 (03) :169-188