Efficacy and tolerability of piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftazidime in association with amikacin for treating nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care patients:: a prospective randomized multicenter trial

被引:43
作者
Alvarez-Lerma, F
Insausti-Ordeñana, J
Jordá-Marcos, R
Maraví-Poma, E
Torres-Martí, A
Nava, J
Martínez-Pellús, A
Palomar, M
Barcenilla, F
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Hosp Mar, Intens Care Unit, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[2] Hosp Prov Navarra, Intens Care Unit, Pamplona, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Son Dureta, Intens Care Unit, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
[4] Hosp Virgen del Camino, Intens Care Unit, Pamplona, Spain
[5] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Intens Care Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Hosp Mutua Terrassa, Intens Care Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Hosp Virgen Arrixaca, Intens Care Unit, Murcia, Spain
[8] Hosp Gen Valle Hebron, Intens Care Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Hosp Arnau Vilanova, Intens Care Unit, Lleida, Spain
关键词
pneumonia; adult; intensive care unit; ceftazidime; amikacin; piperacillin/tazobactam;
D O I
10.1007/s001340000846
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare clinical and bacteriological efficacy as well as tolerability of two regimens of broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftazidime versus piperacillin/tazobactam) combined with amikacin in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care patients. Design: Open label, prospective, multicenter, and randomized phase III clinical trial. Setting: Medical or surgical intensive care units (ICUs) of nine acute-care teaching hospitals in Spain. Patients and participants: One hundred and twenty-four ICU patients with nosocomial pneumonia and requiring mechanical ventilation were included. They were randomized to receive amikacin (15 mg/day divided into two doses) combined with either piperacillin (4 g every 6 h) and tazobactam (0.5 g every 6 h) (n = 88) or ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) (n = 36). Measurements and results: The causative pathogen was determined in 60.2 % of patients in the group of amikacin plus piperacillin/tazobactam and in 76.9 % in the group of amikacin plus ceftazidime. A total of 94 bacterial organisms were isolated among which gram-negative bacilli predominated. Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the most frequent. Clinical response at the end of antibiotic therapy was considered satisfactory (cure and/or improvement) in 63.9 % of patients in the amikacin plus piperacillin/tazobactam group and in 61.5 % in the amikacin plus ceftazidime (odds ratio 1.1; 95 % confidence interval 0.44-2.75). Eradication or presumptive eradication rates for each pathogen and for either gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria were similar in both antibiotic combinations (odds ratio 1.2; 95 % confidence interval 0.39-3.66). A total of 21 adverse effects (23.9 %) occurred in the amikacin plus piperacillin and tazobactam group and six (16.7 %) in the amikacin plus ceftazidime group, thrombocytosis, renal dysfunction, and hepatic cytolysis being the most common. The efficacy and tolerability of the two therapeutic regimens were similar not only in the whole study population, but also in the subset of p. aeruginosa-related pneumonia (odds ratio 1; 95 % confidence interval 0.08-13.37). Conclusions: Amikacin associated with either ceftazidime or piperacillin and tazobactam has shown comparable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of ICU patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 502
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   SUSCEPTIBILITY SURVEY OF PIPERACILLIN ALONE AND IN THE PRESENCE OF TAZOBACTAM [J].
ACAR, JF ;
GOLDSTEIN, FW ;
KITZIS, MD .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :23-28
[2]   Modification of empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit [J].
AlvarezLerma, F ;
Pellus, AM ;
Sanchez, BA ;
Ortiz, EP ;
Jorda, R ;
Barcenilla, F ;
Maravi, E ;
Galvan, B ;
Palomar, M ;
Serra, J ;
Bermejo, B ;
Mateu, A ;
Quintana, E ;
Palacios, MS ;
Giral, R ;
Gonzalez, V ;
Lerma, FA ;
Mesa, JL ;
Melgarejo, JA ;
Martinez, J ;
Insausti, J ;
Olaechea, P ;
Chanovas, M ;
Gilabert, A ;
Junquera, C ;
Valles, J ;
Palacios, F ;
Calvo, R ;
Mesalles, E ;
Nava, J ;
Santos, A ;
Armengol, S ;
Marzo, D .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (05) :387-394
[3]  
[Anonymous], CLIN INTENSIVE CARE
[4]   COMPARATIVE SUSCEPTIBILITY PROFILE OF PIPERACILLIN TAZOBACTAM AGAINST ANAEROBIC-BACTERIA [J].
APPELBAUM, PC .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :29-38
[5]   Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin versus ceftazidime/amikacin:: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial [J].
Brun-Buisson, C ;
Sollet, JP ;
Schweich, H ;
Brière, S ;
Petit, C .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 26 (02) :346-354
[6]  
Campbell GD, 1996, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V153, P1711
[7]  
CHASTRE J, 1988, AM J MED, V85, P499
[8]   Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients [J].
Colardyn, F ;
Faulkner, KL .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 38 (03) :523-537
[9]   EMERGENCE OF RESISTANCE IN GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA DURING THERAPY WITH EXPANDED-SPECTRUM CEPHALOSPORINS [J].
DWORZACK, DL ;
PUGSLEY, MP ;
SANDERS, CC ;
HOROWITZ, EA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1987, 6 (04) :456-459
[10]   NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA IN PATIENTS RECEIVING CONTINUOUS MECHANICAL VENTILATION - PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 52 EPISODES WITH USE OF A PROTECTED SPECIMEN BRUSH AND QUANTITATIVE CULTURE TECHNIQUES [J].
FAGON, JY ;
CHASTRE, J ;
DOMART, Y ;
TROUILLET, JL ;
PIERRE, J ;
DARNE, C ;
GIBERT, C .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1989, 139 (04) :877-884