An assessment of the severity of recurrent appendicitis

被引:47
作者
Dixon, MR
Haukoos, JS
Park, IU
Oliak, D
Kumar, RR
Arnell, TD
Stamos, MJ
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Med Ctr, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[3] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Columbia Presbyterian Med Ctr, Div Colorectal Surg, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
perforated appendicitis; recurrent appendicitis; nonoperative management;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.08.016
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study examines the clinical characteristics of patients who developed recurrent appendicitis after previous nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed, and data from the recurrent and initial episode of appendicitis were collected. Results: In all, 237 patients from 1989 to 2001 were managed nonoperatively for perforated appendicitis and 32 (14%) were readmitted for recurrent appendicitis. Median white blood cell count at recurrence was 9.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.6 to 13.2] versus 13.1 [IQR: 10.8 to 16.1] at initial presentation (P = 0.002). Maximum temperature was 98.6degreesF [IQR: 98.2 to 100.5] at recurrence versus 100.3degreesF [IQR: 99.5 to 101.5] (P = 0.008). Median time for intravenous antibiotics use was 3 [IQR: 3 to 7] days at recurrence versus 6 [IQR: 4 to 8] days initially (P = 0.01). Inpatient stay was also shorter; median length was 6 [IQR: 3 to 8] days compared with 7 [IQR: 5 to 9] days at initial presentation (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Patients managed nonoperatively for perforated appendicitis who later developed recurrent appendicitis exhibited a milder clinical course at recurrence. Elective interval appendectomy may be reserved until a recurrent episode. (C) 2003 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 722
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1889, NY Med J
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Biostatistical analysis
[3]   Is interval appendectomy necessary after rupture of an appendiceal mass? [J].
Ein, SH ;
Shandling, B .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1996, 31 (06) :849-850
[4]  
Eriksson SA, 1998, EUR J SURG, V164, P771
[5]  
Friedell ML, 2000, AM SURGEON, V66, P1158
[6]  
Hoffmann J, 1991, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V36, P18
[7]   Invited commentary [J].
Järvinen, HJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 164 (10) :775-775
[8]   Appendiceal abscesses:: Primary percutaneous drainage and selective interval appendicectomy [J].
Lasson, Å ;
Lundagårds, J ;
Lorén, I ;
Nilsson, PE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 168 (05) :264-269
[9]  
MATTHEW JB, 2001, SURG SCI PRINCIPLES, P1233
[10]   CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF THE APPENDICEAL MASS [J].
NITECKI, S ;
ASSALIA, A ;
SCHEIN, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (01) :18-20