Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department

被引:171
作者
Cury, Ricardo C. [1 ,2 ]
Shash, Khalid [1 ,2 ]
Nagurney, John T. [3 ]
Rosito, Guido [1 ,2 ]
Shapiro, Michael D. [1 ,2 ]
Nomura, Cesar H. [1 ,2 ]
Abbara, Suhny [1 ,2 ]
Bamberg, Fabian [1 ,2 ]
Ferencik, Maros [1 ,4 ]
Schmidt, Ehud J. [4 ]
Brown, David F. [3 ]
Hoffmann, Udo [1 ,2 ]
Brady, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; angina; myocardial infarction; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740597
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background - Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging permits early triage of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain but has been limited by the inability to differentiate new from old myocardial infarction. Our objective was to evaluate a CMR protocol that includes T2-weighted imaging and assessment of left ventricular wall thickness in detecting patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Methods and Results - In this prospective cohort observational study, we enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain, negative cardiac biomarkers, and no ECG changes indicative of acute ischemia. The CMR protocol consisted of T2-weighted imaging, first-pass perfusion, cine function, delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging, and assessment of left ventricular wall thickness. The clinical outcome (acute coronary syndrome) was defined by review of clinical charts by a consensus panel that used American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. Among 62 patients, 13 developed acute coronary syndrome during the index hospitalization. The mean CMR time was 32 +/- 8 minutes. The new CMR protocol (with the addition of T2-weighted and left ventricular wall thickness) increased the specificity, positive predictive value, and overall accuracy from 84% to 96%, 55% to 85%, and 84% to 93%, respectively, compared with the conventional CMR protocol (cine, perfusion, and delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging). Moreover, in a logistic regression analysis that contained information on clinical risk assessment (c-statistic = 0.695) and traditional cardiac risk factors (c-statistic = 0.771), the new CMR protocol significantly improved the c-statistic to 0.958 (P < 0.0001). Conclusions - The present study indicates that a new CMR protocol improves the detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department and adds significant value over clinical assessment and traditional cardiac risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction [J].
Abdel-Aty, H ;
Zagrosek, A ;
Schulz-Menger, J ;
Taylor, AJ ;
Messroghli, D ;
Kumar, A ;
Gross, M ;
Dietz, R ;
Friedrich, MG .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (20) :2411-2416
[2]   Accuracy of biomarkers to diagnose acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: A meta-analysis [J].
Balk, EM ;
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Salem, D ;
Chew, PW ;
Lau, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 37 (05) :478-494
[3]   ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-2002: Summary article - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina) [J].
Braunwald, E ;
Antman, EM ;
Beasley, JW ;
Califf, RM ;
Cheitlin, MD ;
Hochman, JS ;
Jones, RH ;
Kereiakes, D ;
Kupersmith, J ;
Levin, TN ;
Pepine, CJ ;
Schaeffer, JW ;
Smith, EE ;
Steward, DE ;
Theroux, P ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Alpert, JS ;
Faxon, DP ;
Fuster, V ;
Gregoratos, G ;
Hiratzka, LF ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Smith, SC .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (14) :1893-1900
[4]   Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association [J].
Cerqueira, MD ;
Weissman, NJ ;
Dilsizian, V ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Kaul, S ;
Laskey, WK ;
Pennell, DJ ;
Rumberger, JA ;
Ryan, T ;
Verani, MS .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (04) :539-542
[5]  
Fleiss J. L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
[6]   A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evalation of acute chest pain [J].
Goldstein, James A. ;
Gallagher, Michael J. ;
O'Neill, William W. ;
Ross, Michael A. ;
O'Neil, Brian J. ;
Raff, Gilbert L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (08) :863-871
[7]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[8]   Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain [J].
Hoffmann, Udo ;
Nagurney, John T. ;
Moselewski, Fabian ;
Pena, Antonio ;
Ferencik, Maros ;
Chae, Claudia U. ;
Cury, Ricardo C. ;
Butler, Javed ;
Abbara, Suhny ;
Brown, David F. ;
Manini, Alex ;
Nichols, John H. ;
Achenbach, Stephan ;
Brady, Thomas J. .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (21) :2251-2260
[9]   Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain [J].
Ingkanisorn, WP ;
Kwong, RY ;
Bohme, NS ;
Geller, NL ;
Rhoads, KL ;
Dyke, CK ;
Paterson, DI ;
Syed, MA ;
Aletras, AH ;
Arai, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (07) :1427-1432
[10]   Accuracy of imaging technologies in the diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: A meta-analysis [J].
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Salem, D ;
Chew, PW ;
Lau, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 37 (05) :471-477