Acute radiation reactions in oral and pharyngeal mucosa: tolerable levels in altered fractionation schedules

被引:107
作者
Fowler, JF
Harari, PM
Leborgne, F
Leborgne, JH
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Hosp Pereira Rossell, Inst Radiol & Ctr Lucha Contra Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay
[3] Hosp Italiano, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay
关键词
acute reactions; oral mucosa; pharyngeal mucosa; tolerance; head and neck cancer; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; NECK-CANCER; ADVANCED HEAD; CONVENTIONAL RADIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION; CONCOMITANT BOOST; PROLIFERATION; IRRADIATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00231-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose:To investigate whether a predictive estimate can be obtained for a 'tolerance level' of acute oral and pharyngeal mucosal reactions in patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy, using an objective set of dose and time data. Materials and methods:Several dozen radiotherapy schedules for treating head and neck cancer have been reviewed, together with published estimates of whether they were tolerated or (in a number of schedules) not. Those closest to the borderline were given detailed analysis. Total doses and biologically effective doses (BED or ERD) were calculated for a range of starting times of cellular repopulation and rates of daily proliferation. Starting times of proliferation from 5 to 10 days and daily cellular doubling rates of 1-3 days were considered. The standard published form of BED with its linear overall time factor was used: BED = nd(1 + d/ alpha/beta) - Ln2(T-T-k)/alphaT(p) (see text for parameters). Results: A clear progression from acceptable to intolerable mucosal reactions was found, which correlated with total biologically effective dose (BED in our published modeling), for all the head and neck cancer radiotherapy schedules available for study, when ranked into categories of 'intolerable' or 'tolerable'. A review of published mechanisms for mucosal reactions suggested that practical schedules used for treatment caused stimulated compensatory proliferation to start at about 7 days. The starting time of compensatory proliferation had little predictive value in our listing, so we chose the starting time of 7 days. Very short and very long daily doubling rates also had little reliability, so we suggest choosing a doubling time of 2.5 days as a datum. With these parameters a 'tolerance zone of uncertainty' could be identified which predicted acute-reaction acceptability or not of a schedule within a range of about 2-10 Gy in total BED. If concurrent chemoradiotherapy is used, our provisional suggestion is that this zone should be reduced by up to roughly 3-5 Gy 10 in BED, with a request for further evidence. Conclusions: It is suggested that total BED should be used, as specified above. Parameters of alpha = 0.35 Gy -(1), alpha/beta = 10 Gy, Tk = 7 days and Tp = 2.5 days are suggested. The 'acute/tolerance zone' then turns out to be 59-61 Gy10 for radiation-only treatments. Further information about the decrement caused by concurrent head-and-neck cancer chemoradiotherapy, possibly 3-5 Gy10, is required. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Altered fractionation trials in head and neck cancer [J].
Ang, KK .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1998, 8 (04) :230-236
[2]   Radiotherapy-related early morbidity in head and neck cancer: quantitative clinical radiobiology as deduced from the CHART trial [J].
Bentzen, SA ;
Saunders, MI ;
Dische, S ;
Bond, SJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 60 (02) :123-135
[3]   From CHART to CHARTWEL in non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical radiobiological modelling of the expected change in outcome [J].
Bentzen, SM ;
Saunders, MI ;
Dische, S .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 14 (05) :372-381
[4]   A randomized study of very accelerated radiotherapy with and without amifostine in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Bourhis, J ;
De Crevoisier, R ;
Abdulkarim, B ;
Deutsch, E ;
Lusinchi, A ;
Luboinski, B ;
Wibault, P ;
Eschwege, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1105-1108
[5]   CHANGES IN PROLIFERATION RATE OF MOUSE EPIDERMIS AFTER IRRADIATION - CONTINUOUS LABELING STUDIES [J].
DENEKAMP, J ;
STEWART, FA ;
DOUGLAS, BG .
CELL AND TISSUE KINETICS, 1976, 9 (01) :19-29
[6]   Do acute mucosal reactions lead to consequential late reactions in patients with head and neck cancer? [J].
Denham, JW ;
Peters, LJ ;
Johansen, J ;
Poulsen, M ;
Lamb, DS ;
Hindley, A ;
O'Brien, PC ;
Spry, NA ;
Penniment, M ;
Krawitz, H ;
Williamson, S ;
Bear, J ;
Tripcony, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 52 (02) :157-164
[7]   The radiotherapeutic injury - a complex 'wound' [J].
Denham, JW ;
Hauer-Jensen, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 63 (02) :129-145
[8]   Mucosal regeneration during radiotherapy [J].
Denham, JW ;
Walker, QJ ;
Lamb, DS ;
Hamilton, CS ;
OBrien, PC ;
Spry, NA ;
Hindley, A ;
Poulsen, M ;
OBrien, M ;
Tripcony, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1996, 41 (02) :109-118
[9]   A randomised multicentre trial of CHART versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Dische, S ;
Saunders, M ;
Barrett, A ;
Harvey, A ;
Gibson, D ;
Parmar, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 44 (02) :123-136
[10]   Repopulation response of mouse oral mucosa during unconventional radiotherapy protocols [J].
Dorr, W ;
WeberFrisch, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (03) :230-236