A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification

被引:101
作者
Clark, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Psychol, Riverside, CA 92125 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/acp.891
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A computer simulation model of eyewitness identification called WITNESS is proposed and fit to data from three experiments: Juslin et al. (1996), Tunnicliff and Clark (2000), and Wells et al. (1993). These three experiments directly compared two procedures for selecting foils for lineups: by selecting foils that either match the photograph of the suspect or match the description of the perpetrator given by the witness. The model assumes that (a) memory of a perpetrator is incomplete and error-prone, (b) lineup alternatives are matched to this error-prone memory trace, (c) identification decisions are based on a combination of relative and absolute match information, and (d) lineup rejections are based solely on absolute match information. The model provided good fits to data, although with important deviations between the model and data. Implications and limitations of the model, as well as future development of the model, are discussed. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 654
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   WHY MATHEMATICAL-MODELS [J].
BJORK, RA .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1973, 28 (05) :426-433
[2]   Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: Experimental control and real-world simulation [J].
Clark, SE ;
Tunnicliff, JL .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 25 (03) :199-216
[3]   Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data [J].
Clark, SE ;
Gronlund, SD .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (01) :37-60
[4]   A familiarity-based account of confidence-accuracy inversions in recognition memory [J].
Clark, SE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1997, 23 (01) :232-238
[5]  
CLARK SE, 2001, 3 INT C MEM VAL SPAI
[6]   DISTINGUISHING ACCURATE FROM INACCURATE EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS VIA INQUIRIES ABOUT DECISION-PROCESSES [J].
DUNNING, D ;
STERN, LB .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (05) :818-835
[7]   Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications [J].
Dunning, D ;
Perretta, S .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (05) :951-962
[8]   JUDGMENTS OF FREQUENCY AND RECOGNITION MEMORY IN A MULTIPLE-TRACE MEMORY MODEL [J].
HINTZMAN, DL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (04) :528-551
[9]  
HINTZMAN DL, 1991, RELATING THEORY AND DATA : ESSAYS ON HUMAN MEMORY IN HONOR OF BENNET B MURDOCK, P39
[10]   Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation [J].
Juslin, P ;
Olsson, N ;
Winman, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (05) :1304-1316