Extended-duration prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: a metaanalysis of the randomised trials

被引:385
作者
Eikelboom, JW
Quinlan, DJ [1 ]
Douketis, JD
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Radiol, London SE5 9RS, England
[2] Royal Perth Hosp, Dept Haematol, Thrombosis Unit, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Hosp, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05249-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The optimum duration of prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement is uncertain, Our primary objective was to establish the efficacy of extended-duration prophylaxis on symptomatic venous thromboembolic events. Methods We identified randomised trials comparing extended-duration prophylaxis using heparin or warfarin with placebo or untreated control in patients undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE), references from retrieved articles, and abstracts from conference proceedings, and by contact with pharmaceutical companies and investigators. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study design, symptomatic and symptomless venographic venous thromboembolism, death, and bleeding outcomes. Results from individual trials were combined with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Findings Nine studies met our inclusion criteria (3999 patients), eight with low molecular weight heparin, and one with unfractionated heparin. Extended-duration prophylaxis for 30-42 days significantly reduced the frequency of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (1.3% vs 3.3%, OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.24-0.61, numbers needed to treat [NNT]=50), with no statistical evidence of heterogeneity (chi (2) test, p=0.69). There was a greater risk reduction in patients undergoing hip replacement (1.4% vs 4.3%, 0.33; 0.19-0.56, 34) compared with knee replacement (1.0% vs 1.4%, 0.74; 0.26-2.15, 250), A significant reduction in symptomless venographic deep vein thrombosis was also observed (9.6% vs 19.6%, 0.48; 0.36-0.63, 10). There was no increase in major bleeding bur extended-duration prophylaxis was associated with excess minor bleeding (3.7% vs 2.5%, 1.56; 1.08-2.26, numbers needed to harm [NNH]=83). Interpretation Among patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement, extended-duration prophylaxis significantly reduces the frequency of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The reduction in risk is equivalent to about 20 symptomatic events per 1000 patients treated.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ACTA ORTHOP BELG
  • [2] Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement
    Bergqvist, D
    Benoni, G
    Bjorgell, O
    Fredin, H
    Hedlundh, U
    Nicolas, S
    Nilsson, P
    Nylander, G
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (10) : 696 - 700
  • [3] The influence of oral anticoagulation therapy on deep vein thrombosis rates four weeks after total hip replacement
    Caprini, JA
    Arcelus, JI
    Motykie, G
    Kudrna, JC
    Mokhtee, D
    Reyna, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (05) : 813 - 820
  • [4] Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement
    Comp, PC
    Spiro, TE
    Friedman, RJ
    Whitsett, TL
    Johnson, GJ
    Gardiner, GA
    Landon, GC
    Jové, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (03) : 336 - 345
  • [5] Dahl OE, 1997, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V77, P26
  • [6] A controlled comparison of directly observed therapy vs self-administered therapy for active tuberculosis in the urban United States
    Davidson, BL
    [J]. CHEST, 1998, 114 (05) : 1239 - 1243
  • [7] Prolonged prophylaxis after joint replacement: Another step sideways?
    Davidson, BL
    Lensing, AWA
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 132 (11) : 914 - 915
  • [8] Risk of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with treated venous thromboembolism
    Douketis, JD
    Kearon, C
    Bates, S
    Duku, EK
    Ginsberg, JS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (06): : 458 - 462
  • [9] Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    Schneider, M
    Minder, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109): : 629 - 634
  • [10] Prevention of venous thromboembolism
    Geerts, WH
    Heit, JA
    Clagett, GP
    Pineo, GF
    Colwell, CW
    Anderson, FA
    Wheeler, HB
    [J]. CHEST, 2001, 119 (01) : 132S - 175S