Case studies on the Braess Paradox:: Simulating route recommendation and learning in abstract and microscopic models

被引:39
作者
Bazzan, ALC
Klügl, F
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Inst Informat, BR-91501970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Artificial Intelligence, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Braess Paradox; traffic simulation; route choice; agent-based simulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2005.07.003
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The Braess Paradox is a well-known phenomenon: adding a new road to a traffic network may not reduce the total travel time. In fact, some road users may be better off but they contribute to an increase in travel time for other users. This situation happens because drivers do not face the true social cost of an action. Some measures have been proposed to at least minimize the effects of the paradox. However, it is not realistic to assume that the drivers would have all the necessary knowledge in order to compute their rewards from a point-of-view which is not their own, i.e. it cannot be expected that drivers would consider the global performance of the system. Therefore this paper discusses the effects of giving route recommendation to drivers in order to divert them to a situation in which the effects of the paradox are reduced. Two contributions are presented: a generalized cost function for the abstract model, which is valid for any number of drivers, and the calibration and results for a microscopic simulation, where the cost functions are not necessary anymore. These are replaced in the microscopic simulation by the real commuting time perceived by each driver. In all cases we use a learning mechanism to allow drivers to adapt to the changes in the environment. Different rates of drivers receive route recommendation with different rates of acceptance. We show that it is useful to manipulate the route information given to the agents. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 319
页数:21
相关论文
共 13 条
[2]  
ARNOTT R, 1994, AM SCI, V82, P446
[3]  
BAZZAN ALC, 2003, 5 WORKSH DEC THEOR G, P107
[4]  
Braess D, 1968, Unternehmensforschung, V12, P258, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01918335, 10.1007/BF01918335]
[5]   TRAGEDY OF COMMONS [J].
HARDIN, G .
SCIENCE, 1968, 162 (3859) :1243-+
[6]  
Klügl F, 2004, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V7
[7]  
NAGEL K, 1992, J PHYS I, V2, P2221, DOI 10.1051/jp1:1992277
[8]   Braess' paradox: Some new insights [J].
Pas, EI ;
Principio, SL .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1997, 31 (03) :265-276
[9]   Braess paradox: Maximum penalty in a Minimal Critical Network [J].
Penchina, CM .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1997, 31 (05) :379-388
[10]   IN A ROAD NETWORK, INCREASING DELAY LOCALLY CAN REDUCE DELAY GLOBALLY [J].
SMITH, MJ .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 1978, 12 (06) :419-422