The drawbacks and opportunities of carbon charges in metropolitan areas - A spatial general equilibrium approach

被引:35
作者
Tscharaktschiew, Stefan [1 ]
Hirte, Georg [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Traff Sci, Friedrich List Inst Transport & Econ, Chair Spatial Econ & Reg Sci, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Urban general equilibrium model; Climate policy; Transport policy; CO2; emissions; Externalities; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNITED-STATES; LAND-USE; CONGESTION; TRANSPORT; DEMAND; TAXES; CITIES; ELASTICITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In cities there is a variety of economic and spatial forces that may influence to what extent a travel-related CO2 emission pricing can be an effective instrument to contribute to the achievement of CO2 reduction goals Therefore we examine the effectiveness and impact of CO2 emission charges using a spatial general equilibrium model of an urban economy calibrated according to an average German city Our analyses suggest that the imposition of a Pigouvian type CO2 emission charge on urban passenger travel may be able to reduce emissions by about 1%-11% depending on the estimated social damage cost of carbon dioxide Such a policy increases urban welfare mainly on account of a reduction of congestion costs However pricing congestion directly not only provides higher urban welfare but also higher emission reductions Pricing congestion and CO2 emissions simultaneously allows to achieve a wide range of emission reduction goals If however the reduction goal is very ambitious the emission charge must be raised to higher levels Then distortions in the urban markets and in spatial travel decisions lower labor supply and thus urban production income of city residents federal tax revenue Income of landowners outside the city all together implying losses in welfare (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 357
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
*ADAC, 2009, ADAC AUT
[2]   Congestion, land use, and job dispersion: A general equilibrium model [J].
Anas, A ;
Xu, R .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1999, 45 (03) :451-473
[3]   Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries [J].
Anas, Alex ;
Rhee, Hyok-Joo .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2006, 36 (04) :510-541
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EC URBAN TRANSPORTAT, DOI [10.4324/9780203642306, DOI 10.4324/9780203642306]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, World Development Indicators
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STERN REV EC CLIMATE
[8]  
*ARB VOLKSW GES LA, 2009, VOLKS WIRTSCH GES LA
[9]   A future for carbon taxes [J].
Baranzini, A ;
Goldemberg, J ;
Speck, S .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (03) :395-412
[10]   Household transport demand in a CGE-framework [J].
Berg, Charlotte .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (03) :573-597