Partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma can achieve long-term tumor control

被引:114
作者
Van Poppel, H [1 ]
Bamelis, B
Oyen, R
Baert, L
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Urol, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
carcinoma; renal cell; kidney; nephrectomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62751-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Partial nephrectomy is becoming more widely accepted as alternative treatment for small renal cell carcinoma. To analyze its value in tumor control and its complication rate a retrospective study was done. Materials and Methods: A total of 76 patients underwent kidney sparing surgery, which was required in 25 and in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney in 51. Tumor size varied between 0.9 and 15 cm. Simple enucleation was done in 4 and partial nephrectomy in all other cases. The patients were followed every 3 months during year 1, every 4 months during years 2 and 3, and every 6 months during years 4 and 5 postoperatively. Mean followup is 75 months. Results: Eight patients had postoperative complications, most often hemorrhage. None of the patients had local recurrence, although in 3 systemic disease developed. Conclusions: Nephron sparing surgery is more challenging than radical nephrectomy and, therefore, can be more complicated. The selection of suitable candidates is the key to success. Many patients can benefit from nephron sparing surgery for small easily resectable renal cell carcinoma even in presence of a normal contralateral kidney. Randomized trials are needed to establish the definitive role of this approach in kidney cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 678
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Belussi D, 1997, Arch Ital Urol Androl, V69, P87
[2]  
Brisset J M, 1989, Prog Clin Biol Res, V303, P153
[3]   MANAGEMENT OF SMALL UNILATERAL RENAL-CELL CARCINOMAS - RADICAL VERSUS NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY [J].
BUTLER, BP ;
NOVICK, AC ;
MILLER, DP ;
CAMPBELL, SA ;
LICHT, MR .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (01) :34-40
[4]  
Campbell S C, 1995, Semin Urol Oncol, V13, P281
[5]   Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: Accuracy and morbidity [J].
Campbell, SC ;
Novick, AC ;
Herts, B ;
Fischler, DF ;
Meyer, J ;
Levin, HS ;
Chen, RN .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) :25-29
[6]   Elective conservative surgery for renal carcinoma versus radical nephrectomy: A prospective study [J].
DArmiento, M ;
Damiano, R ;
Feleppa, B ;
Perdona, S ;
Oriani, G ;
DeSio, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (01) :15-19
[7]  
Goethuys H, 1996, EUR UROL, V29, P284
[8]   Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography for conservative renal surgery in an ex vivo tumor enucleation study followed by step-sectioning [J].
Gschwend, JE ;
Vogel, U ;
Bader, C ;
Mattfeldt, T ;
Hautmann, RE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (02) :451-454
[9]   Patterns of tumor recurrence and guidelines for followup after nephron sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma [J].
Hafez, KS ;
Novick, AC ;
Campbell, SC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) :2067-2070
[10]   PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR INCIDENTAL RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
HERR, HW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 74 (04) :431-433