Linezolid versus glycopeptide or β-lactam for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections:: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:129
作者
Falagas, Matthew E. [1 ,2 ]
Siempos, Ilias I. [1 ]
Vardakas, Konstantinos Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alfa Inst Biomed Sci, Athens, Greece
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70312-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Linezolid has been approved for the treatment of patients with infections caused by Gram-positive cocci that are resistant to traditionally used antibiotics, including glycopeptides. This oxazolidinone antibiotic has been reported to have excellent pharmacokinetics and effectiveness. We did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to clarify whether linezolid is superior to glycopeptides or beta-lactams for the treatment of Gram-positive infections. 12 RCTs, involving 6093 patients, were included. Overall, with respect to treatment success, linezolid was more effective than glycopeptides or beta-lactams (odds ratio [OR] 1.41 [95% CI 1.11-1.81]). Mortality was similar between the groups (OR 0.97 [0.79-1.19]). Linezolid was more effective than comparators in patients with skin and soft-tissue infections (OR 1.67 [1.31-2.12]) and bacteraemia (OR 2.07 [1.13-3.78]). However, there was no difference in treatment success for patients with pneumonia (OR 1.03 [0.75-1.42]). Treatment with linezolid was not associated with more adverse effects in general (OR 1.40 [0.95-2.06]); however, thrombocytopenia was recorded more commonly in patients receiving linezolid (OR 11.72 [3.66-37.57]). Although linezolid is more effective than its comparators for the empirical treatment of selected patients, several points, such as the use of less potent antistaphylococcal beta-lactams, the same all-cause mortality, and the higher probability of thrombocytopenia, should be taken into account and may limit the use of linezolid to specific patient populations or infections that are difficult to treat with other antibiotics.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 66
页数:14
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible, Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia:: At what costs [J].
Abramson, MA ;
Sexton, DJ .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (06) :408-411
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, JAMA, V282, P1123
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V51, P565
[4]   Trends in antimicrobial-drug resistance in Japan [J].
Arakawa, Y ;
Ike, Y ;
Nagasawa, M ;
Shibata, N ;
Doi, Y ;
Shibayama, K ;
Yagi, T ;
Kurata, T .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 6 (06) :572-575
[5]   The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections [J].
Arbeit, RD ;
Maki, D ;
Tally, FP ;
Campanaro, E ;
Eisenstein, BI .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) :1673-1681
[6]   INTRAVENOUS TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN [J].
ARDATI, KO ;
THIRUMOORTHI, MC ;
DAJANI, AS .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1979, 95 (05) :801-806
[7]   Absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of linezolid in hospitalized patients given enteral feedings [J].
Beringer, P ;
Nguyen, M ;
Hoem, N ;
Louie, S ;
Gill, M ;
Gurevitch, M ;
Wong-Beringer, A .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (09) :3676-3681
[8]   NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA IN MEDICARE PATIENTS - HOSPITAL COSTS AND REIMBURSEMENT PATTERNS UNDER THE PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM [J].
BOYCE, JM ;
POTTERBYNOE, G ;
DZIOBEK, L ;
SOLOMON, SL .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 151 (06) :1109-1114
[9]   Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of linezolid and co-amoxiclav in healthy human volunteers [J].
Burkhardt, O ;
Borner, K ;
von der Höh, N ;
Köppe, P ;
Pletz, MW ;
Nord, CE ;
Lode, H .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 (05) :707-712
[10]   Analysis of 42 cases of septicemia caused by an epidemic strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus:: Evidence of resistance to vancomycin [J].
Burnie, J ;
Matthews, R ;
Jiman-Fatami, A ;
Gottardello, P ;
Hodgetts, S ;
D'arcy, S .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 31 (03) :684-689