Complementary analytical measurements based upon gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, sensor system and human sensory panel: a case study dealing with packaging materials

被引:18
作者
Frank, M
Ulmer, H
Ruiz, J
Visani, P
Weimar, U
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Inst Phys & Theoret Chem, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] MoTech Sensorik Netzwerke & Consulting GmbH, D-72770 Reutlingen, Germany
[3] Nestec Ltd, Nestle Res Ctr, CH-1000 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
quality control; sensory evaluation; GC/MS; gas sensor arrays; sensor drift;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01316-7
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In co-operation with packaging material suppliers and a food manufacturer the quality of different kinds of wrapping foils for chocolate bars was investigated by using the hybrid Modular Sensor System (MOSES II). To check the reproducibility and to deduce quantitative predictions agas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC/MS)-unit connected to a headspace-sampler (HSS) was used as a well established analytical reference instrumentation. All analysed samples were also qualified by a human sensory panel according to the sniff-test. The different packaging material species could be distinguished in a principal component analysis (PCA), With the aid of a principal component regression (PCR) a correlation between human and technical odour perception was carried out. The odour prediction of MOSES II was very satisfying particularly if compared to the human sensory assessments. Additionally, in order to follow the sensor fluctuations the sensor responses upon exposure to a standard sample have been monitored for 5 months. The results of these measurements and the investigations of four different MOSES II units demonstrated the long-term stability of the individual sensors and the high reproducibility from system to system. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 29
页数:19
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   High performance gas sensing of CO:: Comparative tests for semiconducting (SnO2-based) and for amperometric gas sensors [J].
Bârsan, N ;
Stetter, JR ;
Findlay, M ;
Göpel, W .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (13) :2512-2517
[2]   Electronic nose and sensorial analysis: comparison of performances in selected cases [J].
Di Natale, C ;
Macagnano, A ;
Paolesse, R ;
Mantini, A ;
Tarizzo, E ;
D'Amico, A ;
Sinesio, F ;
Bucarelli, FM ;
Moneta, E ;
Quaglia, GB .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 1998, 50 (03) :246-252
[3]   Selection of variables for interpreting multivariate gas sensor data [J].
Eklöv, T ;
Mårtensson, P ;
Lundström, I .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1999, 381 (2-3) :221-232
[4]   Quality tests of electronic noses:: the influence of sample dilution and sensor drifts on the pattern recognition for selected case studies [J].
Frank, M ;
Hermle, T ;
Ulmer, H ;
Mitrovics, J ;
Weimar, U ;
Göpel, W .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2000, 65 (1-3) :88-90
[5]   FORMATION OF METHYL AZELAALDEHYDATE ON AUTOXIDATION OF LIPIDS [J].
FRANKEL, EN ;
NOWAKOWSKA, J ;
EVANS, CD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1961, 38 (03) :161-162
[6]  
GARDNER JW, 1999, ELECT NOSES PRINCIPL, P126
[7]  
Gonzalez Martin Yolanda, 1999, Analytica Chimica Acta, V384, P83
[8]  
HOLMBERG M, 1995, SENSOR ACTUAT B-CHEM, V26, P246
[9]  
Hubschmann H-J, 1996, HDB GC MS GRUNDLAGEN
[10]  
Kolb B., 1997, STATIC HEADSPACE GAS