Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care

被引:101
作者
Murray, E [1 ]
Davis, H
Tai, SS
Coulter, A
Gray, A
Haines, A
机构
[1] UCL, Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Sci, London N19 3UA, England
[2] Picker Inst Europe, Oxford OX1 1RX, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Hlth Econ Res Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2001年 / 323卷 / 7311期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.323.7311.490
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether a decision aid on hormone replacement therapy influences decision making and health outcomes. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting 26 general practices in the United Kingdom. Participants 205 women considering hormone replacement therapy. Intervention Patients' decision aid consisting of an interactive multimedia programme with booklet and printed summary. Outcome measures Patients' and general practitioners' perceptions of who made the decision, decisional conflict, treatment choice, menopausal symptoms, costs, anxiety, and general health status. Results Both patients and general practitioners found the decision aid acceptable. At three months, mean scores for decisional conflict were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (2.5 v 2.8; mean difference - 0.3, 95% confidence interval - 0.5 to - 0.2); this difference was maintained during follow up. A higher proportion of general practitioners perceived that treatment decisions had been made "mainly or only" by the patient in the intervention group than mi the control group (55% v 31%; 24%, 8% to 40%). At three months a lower proportion of women in the intervention group than in the control group were undecided about treatment (14% v 26%; - 12%, - 23% to - 0.4%), and a higher proportion had decided against hormone replacement therapy (46% v 32%; 14%, 1% to 28%); these differences were no longer apparent by nine months. No differences were found between the groups for anxiety, use of health service resources, general health status, or utility. The higher costs of the intervention were largely due to the video disc technology used. Conclusions An interactive multimedia decision aid in the NHS would be popular with patients, reduce decisional conflict, and enable patients to play a more active part in decision making without increasing anxiety. The use of web based technology would reduce the cost of the intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, SAV LIV OUR HLTH NAT
  • [2] VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE
    BRAZIER, JE
    HARPER, R
    JONES, NMB
    OCATHAIN, A
    THOMAS, KJ
    USHERWOOD, T
    WESTLAKE, L
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846): : 160 - 164
  • [3] Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango)
    Charles, C
    Gafni, A
    Whelan, T
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) : 681 - 692
  • [4] Sharing decisions with patients: Is the information good enough?
    Coulter, A
    Entwistle, V
    Gilbert, D
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7179): : 318 - 322
  • [5] Dolan P, 1996, HEALTH ECON, V5, P141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199603)5:2<141::AID-HEC189>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-N
  • [7] PATIENTS CHOICES AND PERCEPTIONS AFTER AN INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN TREATMENT DECISIONS
    ENGLAND, SL
    EVANS, J
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1992, 34 (11) : 1217 - 1225
  • [8] Evidence-informed patient choice - Practical issues of involving patients in decisions about health care technologies
    Entwistle, VA
    Sheldon, TA
    Sowden, A
    Watt, IS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 14 (02) : 212 - 225
  • [9] *FDN INF MED DEC M, 1996, HORM REPL THER SHAR
  • [10] The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer
    Flood, AB
    Wennberg, JE
    Nease, RF
    Fowler, FJ
    Ding, J
    Hynes, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 11 (06) : 342 - 349