Screening for prostate cancer in US men ACPM position statement on preventive practice

被引:92
作者
Lim, Lionel S. [1 ,2 ]
Sherin, Kevin [3 ]
机构
[1] Griffin Hosp, Dept Internal, Derby, CT, England
[2] Griffin Hosp, Dept Prevent Med, Derby, CT, England
[3] Florida State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Family Med & Rural Hlth, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2007.10.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prostate cancer is the leading cancer in U.S. men, and the third leading cause of cancer deaths. Principal screening tests for detection of asymptomatic prostate cancer include digital rectal examination (DRE) and measurement of the serum tumor marker, prostate-specific antigen (PSA). There are risks and benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. Randomized controlled trials of screening by DRE and PSA are limited to two previously published studies. Two other large-scale randomized controlled trials are currently in progress. Methods: This study reviewed the efficacy of DRE and PSA for prostate cancer screening found in the medical literature prior to July 2007. Results: Applications of PSA screening tests used in clinical practice include (1) a PSA cutoff of 4 ng/ml, (2) age-specific PSA, (3) PSA velocity, (4) PSA density, and (5) percent free PSA. Prostate cancer screening can detect early disease and offers the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality. Prostate cancer screening benefits, however, remain unproven, pending results of ongoing trials. There is currently no convincing evidence that early screening, detection, and treatment improves mortality. Limitations of prostate cancer screening include potential adverse health effects associated with false-positive and negative results, and treatment side effects. Conclusions: The American College of Preventive Medicine concludes that there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine population screening with DRE or PSA. Clinicians caring for men, especially African-American men and those with positive family histories, should provide information about potential benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening, and the limitations of current evidence for screening, in order to maximize informed decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 170
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
*AAFP, 2005, SUMMARY RECOMMENDATI
[2]  
*AFP, 1997, ANN INTERN MED, V126, P480
[3]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2007, CAN PROST CANC BE FO
[4]   Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial [J].
Andriole, GL ;
Levin, DL ;
Crawford, ED ;
Gelmann, ER ;
Pinsky, PF ;
Chia, D ;
Kramer, BS ;
Reding, D ;
Church, TR ;
Grubb, RL ;
Izmirlian, G ;
Ragard, LR ;
Clapp, JD ;
Prorok, PC ;
Gohagan, JK .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (06) :433-438
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Oncology
[6]  
*AUA, 2000, ONCOLOGY WILLISTON P, V14, P77
[7]  
*AUA, 2000, ONCOLOGY WILLISTON P, V14, P80
[8]   Prostate cancer screening decreases the absolute risk of being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer - Results from a prospective, population-based randomized controlled trial [J].
Aus, Gunnar ;
Bergdahl, Suante ;
Lodding, Par ;
Liija, Hans ;
Hugosson, Jonas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (03) :659-664
[9]   Screening for prostate cancer: Recommendation and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, P ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (11) :915-916
[10]   Longitudinal PSA changes in men with and without prostate cancer: Assessment of prostate cancer risk [J].
Berger, AP ;
Deibl, M ;
Steiner, H ;
Bektic, J ;
Pelzer, A ;
Spranger, R ;
Klocker, H ;
Bartsch, G ;
Horninger, W .
PROSTATE, 2005, 64 (03) :240-245