Numerical implementation of a CTO-based implicit approach for the BEM solution of usual and sensitivity problems in elasto-plasticity

被引:28
作者
Poon, H
Mukherjee, S [1 ]
Bonnet, M
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Theoret & Appl Mech, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Ecole Polytech, Ctr Commun Polytech Mines Ponts & Chausees, CNRS URA 317, Mecan Solides Lab, Palaiseau, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0955-7997(98)00030-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Boundary element method (BEM) formulations for usual and sensitivity problems in small strain elastoplasticity, using the concept of the consistent tangent operator (CTO), have been recently proposed by Bonnet and Mukherjee. 'Usual' problems here refer to analysis of nonlinear problems in structural and solid continua, for which Simo and Taylor first proposed the use of the CTO within the context of the finite element method (FEM). It was shown by Bonnet and Mukherjee that the sensitivity of the strain increment, associated with an infinitesimal variation of some design parameter, solves a linear problem which is governed by the (converged value of the) same global CTO as the one that appears in the usual problem. This paper presents a general numerical implementation of the above formulations. Numerical results for the usual and sensitivity problems are presented for a two-dimensional (plane strain) example. Sensitivities are calculated with respect to a material parameter that characterizes isotropic strain hardening. The crucial role of the CTO, in providing accurate numerical results for the mechanical variables as well as their sensitivities, is examined in this paper. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 269
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMPUTER SYSTEMS ENG
[2]  
ARIF AFM, 1992, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V35, P369, DOI 10.1002/nme.1620350209
[3]   VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE FOR SHAPE DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS [J].
ARORA, JS ;
CARDOSO, JB .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1992, 30 (02) :538-547
[4]   A sensitivity analysis for the optimal design of metal-forming processes [J].
Badrinarayanan, S ;
Zabaras, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1996, 129 (04) :319-348
[5]  
Banerjee PK., 1994, BOUNDARY ELEMENT MET
[6]   Implicit BEM formulations for usual and sensitivity problems in elasto-plasticity using the consistent tangent operator concept [J].
Bonnet, M ;
Mukherjee, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 1996, 33 (30) :4461-4480
[7]  
Chandra A., 1997, Boundary Element Methods in Manufacturing
[8]   DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS .1. THEORY [J].
CHOI, KK ;
SANTOS, JLT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1987, 24 (11) :2039-2055
[9]   HYPERSINGULAR FORMULATION FOR BOUNDARY STRESS EVALUATION [J].
GUIGGIANI, M .
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 1994, 13 (02) :169-179
[10]  
HODGE PG, 1950, J APPL MECH-T ASME, V17, P180