Fine particulate source apportionment using data from the USEPA speciation trends network in Chicago, Illinois: Comparison of two source apportionment models

被引:62
作者
Rizzo, Michael J. [1 ]
Scheff, Peter A.
机构
[1] US EPA, Air Qual Anal Grp, Air Qual Anal Div, Off Air Qual Planning & Standards, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Sch Publ Hlth, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
source apportionment; Positive matrix factorization; Chemical mass balance; PM2.5; Speciation trends network (STN); Receptor modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.03.055
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Data from two of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's speciation trends network fine particulate matter sites within Chicago, Illinois were analyzed using the chemical mass balance (CMB) and positive matrix factorization (PMF) models to determine source contributions to the ambient fine particulate concentrations. The results from the two models were compared to determine the similarities and differences in the source contributions. This included examining the differences in the magnitude of the individual source contributions as well as the correlation between the contribution values from the two methods. The results showed that both models predicted sulfates, nitrates and motor vehicles as the three highest fine particle contributors for the two sites accounting for approximately 80% of the total. The PMF model attributed a slightly greater amount of fine particulate to the road salt, steel and soil sources while vegetative burning contributed more in the CMB results. Correlations between the contribution results from the two models were high for sulfates, nitrates and road salt with very good correlations existing for motor vehicles and petroleum refineries. The predicted PMF profiles agreed well with measured source profiles for the major species associated with each source. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6276 / 6288
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Brown SG, 2005, MULTIVARIATE RECEPTO
[2]  
CHUNG J, 1994, P APCA ANN M, V9
[3]  
Engelbrecht J.P., 2002, Environ. Sci. Pol., V5, P157, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00029-1
[4]   RECEPTOR MODEL AND EMISSIONS INVENTORY SOURCE APPORTIONMENTS OF NONMETHANE ORGANIC GASES IN CALIFORNIA SAN-JOAQUIN VALLEY AND SAN-FRANCISCO BAY AREA [J].
FUJITA, EM ;
WATSON, JG ;
CHOW, JC ;
MAGLIANO, KL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 29 (21) :3019-3035
[5]   DEALING WITH NEAR COLLINEARITY IN CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE RECEPTOR MODELS [J].
HENRY, RC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (05) :933-938
[6]  
*HLTH EFF I, 2002, EMISS DIES GAS ENG M
[7]   Receptor modeling of ambient and personal exposure samples: 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study [J].
Hopke, PK ;
Ramadan, Z ;
Paatero, P ;
Norris, GA ;
Landis, MS ;
Williams, RW ;
Lewis, CW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (23) :3289-3302
[8]   RECEPTOR MODELING APPROACH TO VOC EMISSION INVENTORY VALIDATION [J].
KENSKI, DM ;
WADDEN, RA ;
SCHEFF, PA ;
LONNEMAN, WA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (07) :483-491
[9]  
KENSKI DM, 1994, P APCA ANN M, V9
[10]   Sources of fine particles in a rural Midwestern US area [J].
Kim, E ;
Hopke, PK ;
Kenski, DM ;
Koerber, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (13) :4953-4960