Incorporating historical control data when comparing tumor incidence rates

被引:23
作者
Peddada, Shyamal D. [1 ]
Dinse, Gregg E. [1 ]
Kissling, Grace E. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIEHS, Biostat Branch, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
cancer bioassay; carcinogenicity experiment; National Toxicology Program; order-restricted inference; poly-3; quantal response; survival adjustment;
D O I
10.1198/016214506000001356
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Animal carcinogenicity studies, such as those conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), focus on detecting trends in tumor rates across dose groups. Over time, the NTP has compiled vast amounts of data on tumors in control animals. Currently, this information is used informally, without the benefit of statistical tests for carcinogenicity that directly incorporate historical data on control animals. This article proposes a survival-adjusted test for detecting dose-related trends in tumor incidence rates, which incorporates data on historical control rates and formally accounts for variation in these rates among studies. An extensive simulation, based on a wide range of realistic situations, demonstrates that the proposed test performs well compared with the current NTP test. which does not incorporate historical control data. In particular, our test can aid in interpreting the occurrence of a few tumors in treated animals that are rarely seen in controls. One such example, which motivates our work, concerns the analysis of histiocytic sarcoma in the NTP's 2-year cancer bioassay of benzophenone. Whereas the occurrence of three histiocytic sarcomas in female rats was not significant according to the current NTP testing procedure (p =.074), it was highly significant (p =.004) when control data from six recent historical studies were included and our test was applied to the combined data.
引用
收藏
页码:1212 / 1220
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NIH PUBL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NIH PUBL
[3]  
[Anonymous], STAT INFERENCE UNDER
[4]   TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS AND FREQUENCIES [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1955, 11 (03) :375-386
[5]   EFFECTS OF TREATMENT-INDUCED MORTALITY AND TUMOR-INDUCED MORTALITY ON TESTS FOR CARCINOGENICITY IN SMALL SAMPLES [J].
BAILER, AJ ;
PORTIER, CJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (02) :417-431
[6]   RATIO ESTIMATES, THE DELTA METHOD, AND QUANTAL RESPONSE TESTS FOR INCREASED CARCINOGENICITY [J].
BIELER, GS ;
WILLIAMS, RL .
BIOMETRICS, 1993, 49 (03) :793-801
[7]   SOME METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING THE COMMON X2 TESTS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) :417-451
[8]   COMBINING HISTORICAL AND RANDOMIZED CONTROLS FOR ASSESSING TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
SELWYN, MR ;
WEEKS, BJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 78 (382) :221-227
[9]   Bayesian incidence analysis of animal tumorigenicity data [J].
Dunson, DB ;
Dinse, GE .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2001, 50 :125-141
[10]   Bayesian methods for a three-state model for rodent carcinogenicity studies [J].
French, JL ;
Ibrahim, JG .
BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (04) :906-916