The carrot, not the stick:: appetitive rather than aversive gustatory stimuli support associative olfactory learning in individually assayed Drosophila larvae

被引:48
作者
Hendel, T
Michels, B
Neuser, K
Schipanski, A
Kaun, K
Sokolowski, M
Marohn, F
Michel, R
Heisenberg, M
Gerber, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Biozentrum, Dept Genet & Neurobiol, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Biol, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Appl Math & Stat, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY | 2005年 / 191卷 / 03期
关键词
Drosophila larva; learning; olfaction; taste; reinforcement;
D O I
10.1007/s00359-004-0574-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The ability to learn is universal among animals; we investigate associative learning between odors and "tastants'' in larval Drosophila melanogaster. As biologically important gustatory stimuli, like sugars, salts, or bitter substances have many behavioral functions, we investigate not only their reinforcing function, but also their response-modulating and response-releasing function. Concerning the response-releasing function, larvae are attracted by fructose and repelled by sodium chloride and quinine; also, fructose increases, but salt and quinine suppress feeding. However, none of these stimuli has a nonassociative, modulatory effect on olfactory choice behavior. Finally, only fructose but neither salt nor quinine has a reinforcing effect in associative olfactory learning. This implies that the response-releasing, response-modulating and reinforcing functions of these tastants are dissociated on the behavioral level. These results open the door to analyze how this dissociation is brought about on the cellular and molecular level; this should be facilitated by the cellular simplicity and genetic accessibility of the Drosophila larva.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 279
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   LEARNING IN NORMAL AND MUTANT DROSOPHILA LARVAE [J].
ACEVESPINA, FO ;
QUINN, WG .
SCIENCE, 1979, 206 (4414) :93-96
[2]   GENETICS OF OLFACTORY BEHAVIOR IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
AYYUB, C ;
PARANJAPE, J ;
RODRIGUES, V ;
SIDDIQI, O .
JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS, 1990, 6 (04) :243-262
[4]   The role of quinine chlorohydrate in conditioned inhibition of the tarsal reflex in Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Bouhouche, A ;
Elkhessaimi, A ;
Vaysse, G ;
Choulli, MK .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1995, 49 (04) :520-529
[5]  
Cannon CM, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10827
[6]   Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: Acquisition and retention [J].
Christian, KM ;
Thompson, RF .
LEARNING & MEMORY, 2003, 10 (06) :427-455
[7]   What and how do maggots smell? [J].
Cobb, M .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 74 (04) :425-459
[8]   CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION OF PROBOSCIS EXTENSION IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
DEJIANNE, D ;
MCGUIRE, TR ;
PRUZANHOTCHKISS, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 99 (01) :74-80
[9]   Ecological relevance of associative learning in fruit fly larvae [J].
Dukas, R .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1999, 45 (3-4) :195-200
[10]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26