Accounting for estimation optimality criteria in simulated annealing

被引:20
作者
Goovaerts, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY | 1998年 / 30卷 / 05期
关键词
estimation; stochastic simulation; loss function; flow characteristics; mean absolute error;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021738027334
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper presents both estimation and simulation as optimization problems that differ in the optimization criteria, minimization of a local expected loss for estimation and reproduction of global statistics (semivariogram, histogram) for simulation. An intermediate approach is proposed whereby an initial random image is gradually modified using simulated annealing so as to better match both local and global constraints. The relative weights of the different constraints in the objective function allow the user to strike a balance between smoothness of the estimated map and reproduction of spatial variability by simulated maps. The procedure is illustrated using a synthetic dataset. The proposed approach is shown to enhance the influence of observations on neighboring simulated values, hence the final realizations appear to be ''better conditioned'' to the sample information. it also produces maps that are more accurate (smaller prediction error) than stochastic simulation ignoring local constraints, bur nor as accurate as E-type estimation. Flow simulation results show that accounting for local constraints yields, on average, smaller errors in production forecast than a smooth estimated map or a simulated map that reproduces only the histogram and semivariogram. The approach thus reduces the risk associated with rite use of a single realization for forecasting and planning.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 534
页数:24
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Christakos G., 1992, Random field models in earth sciences
[2]   Modeling spatial variability using geostatistical simulation [J].
Desbarats, AJ .
GEOSTATISTICS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 1283 :32-48
[3]  
Deutsch C.V., 1998, GSLIB GEOSTATISTICAL
[4]   PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE APPLICATION OF SIMULATED ANNEALING TO STOCHASTIC SIMULATION [J].
DEUTSCH, CV ;
COCKERHAM, PW .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1994, 26 (01) :67-82
[5]  
DEUTSCH CV, 1992, 5 STANF U STANF CTR
[6]  
Farmer C.L., 1988, Mathematics in Oil Production, P235
[7]   STOCHASTIC RELAXATION, GIBBS DISTRIBUTIONS, AND THE BAYESIAN RESTORATION OF IMAGES [J].
GEMAN, S ;
GEMAN, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1984, 6 (06) :721-741
[8]   Stochastic simulation of categorical variables using a classification algorithm and simulated annealing [J].
Goovaerts, P .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1996, 28 (07) :909-921
[9]   COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF INDICATOR ALGORITHMS FOR MODELING CONDITIONAL-PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION-FUNCTIONS [J].
GOOVAERTS, P .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1994, 26 (03) :389-411
[10]  
GOOVAERTS P, 1997, GEOSTATISTICS NATURA