Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair

被引:59
作者
Chowbey, P. K. [1 ,2 ]
Garg, N. [2 ]
Sharma, A. [2 ]
Khullar, R. [2 ]
Soni, V. [2 ]
Baijal, M. [2 ]
Mittal, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] DS MKT, AYUSHMAN Endosurg, New Delhi 110060, India
[2] Max Healthcare, Max Inst Minimal Access Metab & Bariatr Surg, New Delhi 110017, India
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 24卷 / 12期
关键词
TEP repair; Ultrapro mesh; Prolene mesh; Chronic groin pain; Recurrence; INGUINAL-HERNIA; CHRONIC PAIN; LICHTENSTEIN; IMPACT; HERNIORRHAPHY; METAANALYSIS; RECURRENCE; PROLENE; SUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-010-1092-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The purported advantage of lightweight large-pore meshes is improved biocompatibility that translates into lesser postoperative pain and earlier rehabilitation. However, there are concerns of increased hernia recurrence rate. We undertook a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare early and late outcome measures with the use of a lightweight (Ultrapro) mesh and heavyweight (Prolene) mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) groin hernia repair. Methods A prospective study was performed on 402 patients (191 in Ultrapro and 211 in Prolene group) with bilateral groin hernias who underwent endoscopic TEP groin hernia repair from March 2006 to June 2007. All operations were performed by five consultants following a standardized operative protocol. Chronic groin pain and hernia recurrence were evaluated as primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measure were early postoperative pain, operative time, number of fixation devices required to fix the mesh, return to normal daily activities of work, seroma, and testicular pain. Results At 1-year follow-up, incidence in Ultrapro versus Prolene group for chronic groin pain was 1.6% vs. 4.7% (p = 0.178) and recurrence was 1.3% vs. 0.2% (p = 0.078). In Ultrapro versus Prolene group, mean visual analogue score for postoperative pain at day 7 was 1.07 vs. 1.31 (p = 0.00), mean return to normal activities was 1.82 vs. 2.09 days (p = 0.00), and mean number of fixation devices per patient required to fix the mesh was 4.22 vs. 4.08 (p = 0.043). Conclusion Lightweight meshes appear to have advantages in terms of lesser pain and early return to normal activity. However, more patients had hernia recurrence with lightweight meshes, especially for larger hernias. We surmise that the lightweight meshes have greater tendency to get displaced from their intended position during desufflation at the conclusion of endoscopic TEP repair.
引用
收藏
页码:3073 / 3079
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results [J].
Agarwal, Brij B. ;
Agarwal, Krishna Adit ;
Mahajan, Krishan C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (02) :242-247
[2]   Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs [J].
Akolekar, D. ;
Kumar, S. ;
Khan, L. R. ;
de Beaux, A. C. ;
Nixon, S. J. .
HERNIA, 2008, 12 (01) :39-43
[3]   Operative findings in recurrent hernia after a Lichtenstein procedure [J].
Bay-Nielsen, M ;
Nordin, P ;
Nilsson, E ;
Kehlet, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 182 (02) :134-136
[4]   Midline abdominal wall closure:: A new prophylactic mesh concept [J].
Bellon, Juan M. ;
Lopez-Hervas, Pedro ;
Rodriguez, Marta ;
Garcia-Honduvilla, Natalio ;
Pascual, Gemma ;
Bujan, Julia .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 203 (04) :490-497
[5]   Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bittner, R ;
Sauerland, S ;
Schmedt, CG .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (05) :605-615
[6]   The role of endoseopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: Where do we stand in 2005? [J].
Bowne, W. B. ;
Morgenthal, C. B. ;
Castro, A. E. ;
Shah, P. ;
Ferzli, G. S. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (05) :707-712
[7]   Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia [J].
Bringman, S. ;
Wollert, S. ;
Osterberg, J. ;
Smedberg, S. ;
Granlund, H. ;
Heikkinen, T. -J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (09) :1056-1059
[8]   Early results of a randomized multicenter trial comparing Prolene and VyproII mesh in bilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplast (TEP) [J].
Bringman, S ;
Wollert, S ;
Osterberg, J ;
Heikkinen, T .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (04) :536-540
[9]  
Burger JWA, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P578
[10]  
Cobb William S, 2005, Surg Innov, V12, P63, DOI 10.1177/155335060501200109