Osteoporosis and implant failure: An exploratory case-control study

被引:105
作者
Becker, W
Hujoel, PP
Becker, BE
Willingham, H
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Dent, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
osteoporosis; dental implant failure; outcome assessment; clinical trials; controlled;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.625
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Osteoporosis has been suggested as a risk factor for implant failure, but data supporting such a link are limited. Methods: A case-control study was designed to evaluate the association between osteoporosis and dental implant failure. Cases (n = 49) and controls (n = 49) were selected from a private practice. The following measures were collected for each patient: 1) peripheral dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (pDEXA) bone measurements at the distal and proximal radius and ulna; 2) classification of bone quality and quantity at the time of implant placement; and 3) questionnaire data regarding potentially confounding variables. Generalized estimating equations were used to relate the likelihood of having at least one implant failure in an individual to osteoporosis measures. Results: The results suggested that there was no association between pDEXA scores at the radius and ulna and the risk for implant failure. For every 1-unit increase in bone density as measured by pDEXA t-score at proximal and distal radius and ulna, the risk for a patient to lose at least one implant changed by +14% and -6%, respectively (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.62 and odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.23). The simple visual assessment of local bone quality had a moderately sized relationship to implant failure. Implants placed in sites with thin cortical bone increased the chance for a patient to lose at least one implant by 130% when compared to implants placed in a thick cortical layer or compact bone (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-5.4). Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that a simple visual assessment of bone quality at the site of implant placement may be more informative regarding implant failure than pDEXA bone density measures obtained at peripheral bones. In order to determine whether peripheral osteoporosis measurements have a small or moderate association with implant loss, studies with larger sample sizes will be required.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 631
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P347
[2]   OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANTS - A SWEDISH MULTICENTER STUDY OF 8139 CONSECUTIVELY INSERTED NOBELPHARMA IMPLANTS [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
DAHL, E ;
ENBOM, L ;
ENGEVALL, S ;
ENGQUIST, B ;
ERIKSSON, AR ;
FELDMANN, G ;
FREIBERG, N ;
GLANTZ, PO ;
KJELLMAN, O ;
KRISTERSSON, L ;
KVINT, S ;
KONDELL, PA ;
PALMQUIST, J ;
WERNDAHL, L ;
ASTRAND, P .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1988, 59 (05) :287-296
[3]  
[Anonymous], COMPEND CONTIN ED DE
[4]  
[Anonymous], COMPEND CONTIN ED DE
[5]  
Avivi-Arber L, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P311
[6]  
Bain C A, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P609
[7]  
Bando K, 1998, Ann Periodontol, V3, P322, DOI 10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.322
[8]  
BLACK DM, 1992, J BONE MINER RES, V7, P633
[9]  
Branemark P I, 1977, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, V16, P1
[10]  
CUMMINGS S, 1995, AM J MED S2A, V98