Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, NC

被引:305
作者
Hunt, W. F. [1 ]
Smith, J. T. [2 ]
Jadlocki, S. J. [3 ]
Hathaway, J. M. [1 ]
Eubanks, P. R. [4 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] McKim & Creed, Cary, NC 27511 USA
[3] Stormwater Serv, Charlotte, NC USA
[4] Water Qual Dept, Mecklenburg, NC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2008年 / 134卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403)
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioretention is a stormwater treatment practice that has gained popularity due to its aesthetics, potential to reduce flooding, and early documented improvements to stormwater quality. A bioretention cell in an urban setting was examined in Charlotte, N.C. from 2004 to 2006. Flow-weighted, composite water quality samples were collected for 23 events and analyzed for TKN, NH4-N, NO2-3-N, TP, TSS, BOD-5, Cu, Zn, Fe, and Pb. Grab samples were collected from 19 storms for fecal coliform, and 14 events for Escherichia coli (E. coli). There were significant reductions (p < 0.05) in the concentrations of TN, TKN, NH4-N, BOD-5, fecal coliform, E. Coli, TSS, Cu, Zn, and Pb. Iron concentrations significantly increased (p < 0.05). NO2-3-N concentrations were essentially unchanged. Efficiency ratios for TN, TKN, NH4-N, TP, and TSS were 0.32, 0.44, 0.73, 0.31, and 0.60, respectively. Fecal coliform and E. coli efficiency ratios were 0.69 and 0.71, respectively. Efficiency ratios for Zn, Cu, and Pb were 0.77, 0.54, and 0.31, respectively. Concentrations of Fe increased by 330%. The peak outflow of the bioretention cell for 16 storms with less than 42 mm of rainfall was at least 96.5% less than the peak inflow, with a mean peak flow reduction being 99%. These results indicated that in an urban environment, bioretention systems can reduce concentrations of most target pollutants, including pathogenic bacteria indicator species. Additionally, bioretention can effectively reduce peak runoff from small to midsize storm events.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 408
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   SOURCES OF POLLUTANTS IN WISCONSIN STORMWATER [J].
BANNERMAN, RT ;
OWENS, DW ;
DODDS, RB ;
HORNEWER, NJ .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 28 (3-5) :241-259
[2]   Performance, cost, and maintenance requirements of Austin sand filters [J].
Barrett, ME .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2003, 129 (03) :234-242
[3]  
Coffman L., 1993, Water Management in the 90's: A Time for Innovation, P126, DOI [DOI 10.14796/JWMM.R176-02, 10.14796/jwmm.r176-02]
[4]   Water quality improvement through bioretention: Lead, copper, and zinc removal [J].
Davis, AP ;
Shokouhian, M ;
Sharma, H ;
Minami, C ;
Winogradoff, D .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2003, 75 (01) :73-82
[5]   Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management [J].
Davis, AP ;
Shokouhian, M ;
Sharma, H ;
Minami, C .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2001, 73 (01) :5-14
[6]   Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden [J].
Dietz, ME ;
Clausen, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (04) :1335-1340
[7]   A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment [J].
Dietz, ME ;
Clausen, JC .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2005, 167 (1-4) :123-138
[8]  
Hager M. C., 2003, STORMWATER, V4, P12
[9]  
HARDY DH, 2003, 1 NC DEP AGR CONS SE
[10]  
Heasom W, 2006, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V42, P1329, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb05616.x