High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being

被引:1452
作者
Kahneman, Daniel [1 ]
Deaton, Angus [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Ctr Hlth & Well Being, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
life evaluation; emotional experience; household income; satiation; happiness; HAPPINESS; SMOKING; WEALTH; MONEY; METAANALYSIS; PERSONALITY; EASTERLIN; WORLD;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1011492107
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Recent research has begun to distinguish two aspects of subjective well-being. Emotional well-being refers to the emotional quality of an individual's everyday experience-the frequency and intensity of experiences of joy, stress, sadness, anger, and affection that make one's life pleasant or unpleasant. Life evaluation refers to the thoughts that people have about their life when they think about it. We raise the question of whether money buys happiness, separately for these two aspects of well-being. We report an analysis of more than 450,000 responses to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, a daily survey of 1,000 US residents conducted by the Gallup Organization. We find that emotional well-being (measured by questions about emotional experiences yesterday) and life evaluation(measured by Cantril's Self-Anchoring Scale) have different correlates. Income and education are more closely related to life evaluation, but health, care giving, loneliness, and smoking are relatively stronger predictors of daily emotions. When plotted against log income, life evaluation rises steadily. Emotional well-being also rises with log income, but there is no further progress beyond an annual income of similar to$75,000. Low income exacerbates the emotional pain associated with such misfortunes as divorce, ill health, and being alone. We conclude that high income buys life satisfaction but not happiness, and that low income is associated both with low life evaluation and low emotional well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:16489 / 16493
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Well-being over time in Britain and the USA [J].
Blanchflower, DG ;
Oswald, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (7-8) :1359-1386
[2]   Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles [J].
Clark, Andrew E. ;
Frijters, Paul ;
Shields, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2008, 46 (01) :95-144
[3]   ECONOMIC SATISFACTION AND INCOME RANK IN SMALL NEIGHBOURHOODS [J].
Clark, Andrew E. ;
Kristensen, Nicolai ;
Westergard-Nielsen, Niels .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2009, 7 (2-3) :519-527
[4]   Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll [J].
Deaton, Angus .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 22 (02) :53-72
[5]   Will money increase subjective well-being? [J].
Diener, E ;
Biswas-Diener, R .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2002, 57 (02) :119-169
[6]   SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING [J].
DIENER, E .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 95 (03) :542-575
[7]   Wealth and Happiness Across the World: Material Prosperity Predicts Life Evaluation, Whereas Psychosocial Prosperity Predicts Positive Feeling [J].
Diener, Ed ;
Ng, Weiting ;
Harter, James ;
Arora, Raksha .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 99 (01) :52-61
[8]  
Diener Ed., 1999, Well Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, P434
[9]  
Graham C., 2010, HAPPINESS WORLD PARA
[10]   Money does not buy happiness: Or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption [J].
Headey, Bruce ;
Muffels, Ruud ;
Wooden, Mark .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2008, 87 (01) :65-82