Differentiated Versus Integrated Transactive Memory Effectiveness: It Depends on the Task

被引:26
作者
Gupta, Naina [1 ]
Hollingshead, Andrea B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Business Sch, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Univ So Calif, Annenberg Sch Commun, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
transactive memory; group performance; knowledge differentiation; knowledge integration; shared cognition; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; GROUP-PERFORMANCE; MENTAL MODELS; INFORMATION; SYSTEMS; COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; EXPERTISE; BEHAVIORS; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1037/a0019992
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study examined the relations between task type, transactive memory, and group performance. Twenty-three-person groups collaborated on two group tasks: a recall task and an intellective task. The type of transactive memory system imposed on the group (differentiated or integrated) was manipulated. Although there were no statistically significant performance differences between the two types of transactive memory systems on the recall task, the results showed that groups with an integrated transactive memory system completed an intellective task faster and had greater accuracy than those with a differentiated transactive memory system. Groups with an integrated transactive memory reported more helping, error correction, and collaboration, whereas groups with a differentiated transactive memory reported more clarity in the division of responsibility. A content analysis of the videotaped interactions showed that groups with an integrated transactive memory demonstrated behaviors emphasizing the use of shared information, whereas groups with a differentiated transactive memory demonstrated behaviors emphasizing the use of unique information.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 398
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PROGR SOCIAL PSYCHOL
[2]   Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance [J].
Austin, JR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (05) :866-878
[3]  
Beersma B, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P572, DOI [10.2307/30040650, 10.5465/30040650]
[4]   Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people [J].
Brandon, DP ;
Hollingshead, AB .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (06) :633-644
[5]  
Brodbeck FC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P459, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.24351441
[6]   Reflections on shared cognition [J].
Cannon-Bowers, JA ;
Salas, E .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 :195-202
[7]  
CANNONBOWERS JA, 1993, INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DECISION MAKING, P221
[8]   Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance:: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? [J].
Förster, J ;
Higgins, ET ;
Bianco, AT .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 90 (01) :148-164
[9]   Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures [J].
Gibson, CB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (02) :138-152
[10]   THE COMMON KNOWLEDGE EFFECT - INFORMATION SHARING AND GROUP JUDGMENT [J].
GIGONE, D ;
HASTIE, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (05) :959-974