Semantic processing of open- and closed-class words:: an event-related potentials study

被引:28
作者
Hinojosa, JA
Martín-Loeches, M
Casado, P
Muñoz, F
Carretié, L
Fernández-Frías, C
Pozo, MA
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Brain Mapping Unit, Pluridisciplinary Inst, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense, Dept Psicobiol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Psicol Biol & Salud, Madrid, Spain
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2001年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
event-related potential; recognition potential; open-class word; closed-class word; semantic processing;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00012-X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Previous research on open- and closed-class words has revealed the existence of several differences in the processing of these types of vocabulary. In this paper the processing of open- and closed-class words was compared by means of an early electrical brain response, recognition potential (RP), which indexes semantic processing and originates from basal extrastriate areas. The effects of word frequency on closed-class words were also investigated. For these purposes, open- and dosed-class words, among other stimuli, were presented by means of the rapid stream stimulation procedure. Results showed that there were no significant differences when comparing the RP evoked by open- and closed-class words in the left hemisphere. However. in the right hemisphere this situation changed: the RP evoked by open- and closed-class words did differ. Moreover, there were no differences between the RP evoked by closed-class words and pseudowords, These patterns of results suggest that the semantic processing of closed-class words shares some aspects with the processing of open-class words. despite the existence of some differences. Thus, whereas the semantic processing of open-class words recruits brain areas of both hemispheres, the semantic processing of closed-class words is left-lateralized. A second purpose of this work is to study word-frequency effects on closed-class words. Our results show the insensitivity of closed-class words to word-frequency effects. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 407
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
ALAMEDA JR, 1995, DICCIONARIO FREUENCI
[2]  
American Electroencephalographic Society, 1991, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V3, P38
[3]  
[Anonymous], METHODS ANAL BRAIN E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions
[5]  
[Anonymous], BIOL STUDIES MENTAL
[6]   Dual processing of open- and closed-class words [J].
Biassou, N ;
Obler, LK ;
Nespoulous, JL ;
Dordain, M ;
Harris, KS .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 57 (03) :360-373
[7]   HEMISPHERE DIFFERENCES IN THE RECOGNITION OF CLOSED AND OPEN CLASS WORDS [J].
BRADLEY, DC ;
GARRETT, MF .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1983, 21 (02) :155-159
[8]   Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: Open- and closed-class words [J].
Brown, CM ;
Hagoort, P ;
ter Keurs, M .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 11 (03) :261-281
[9]   VISUAL-FIELD EFFECTS FOR PROCESSING CONTENT AND FUNCTION WORDS [J].
CHIARELLO, C ;
NUDING, S .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1987, 25 (03) :539-548
[10]   GRAMMATICAL INCONGRUENCY AND VOCABULARY TYPES [J].
COLE, P ;
SEGUI, J .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1994, 22 (04) :387-394