In search of order: Traditional business reformism and the crisis of neoliberalism in Massachusetts

被引:23
作者
Jonas, AEG
机构
关键词
industrial governance; local economies; traditional reformism; neoliberalism; fiscal crisis; Massachusetts;
D O I
10.2307/622390
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Local politics is undergoing a transformation as neoliberal business organizations deliberately eschew traditional policy-making channels and promote a new economic development agenda for regions and localities in the global economy. In the United States, however, traditional business reformism remains an influential force in local politics. This paper examines the activities of a traditional reformist organization, the Associated Industries of Massachusetts (AIM), and its approach to Massachusetts' fiscal crisis of 1989-91. AIM's approach was constructed around service provision, networking for consensus and coalition building, and emphasized the legislative process as the principal economic policy-making tool. A neoliberal high-tech organization, the Massachusetts High Technology Council (MHTC), adopted a confrontational style of industrial governance and relied upon the initiative petition process. MHTC's neoliberal policy approach was rejected by the Massachusetts business and political leadership in favour of AIM's traditional reformist style. Theories of urban and regional development should consider the ways in which fractional divisions within capital lead to policy approaches at different levels in the state.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 634
页数:18
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Aglietta Michel., 1979, THEORY CAPITALIST RE
[2]  
Alcaly Roger E., 1977, The Fiscal Crisis of American Cities
[3]  
AMIN A, 1994, AREA, V26, P13
[4]   Constructing consensus: Environmental policy making in Massachusetts [J].
Angel, DP ;
Jonas, AEG ;
Theyel, G .
URBAN GEOGRAPHY, 1995, 16 (05) :397-413
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, POLITICS URBAN DEV
[6]  
[Anonymous], CAPITAL CLASS
[7]  
BARFF RA, 1988, PAP REG SCI ASSOC, V65, P151
[8]  
BISH RL, 1971, PUBLIC EC METROPOLIT
[9]  
*BOST URB STUD GRO, 1984, RUL BOST
[10]  
BROWNE LE, 1988, NEW ENGL ECON REV, P3