Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature

被引:727
作者
Anderson, Cameron [1 ]
Hildreth, John Angus D. [1 ]
Howland, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
status; respect; rank; desire; motive; SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL-STATUS; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; SELF-DETERMINATION; AMERICAN-DREAM; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; NONVERBAL EXPRESSION; COMPETITIVE ALTRUISM; INDIRECT RECIPROCITY; SUBMISSIVE BEHAVIOR; HIERARCHY FORMATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0038781
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The current review evaluates the status hypothesis, which states that that the desire for status is a fundamental motive. Status is defined as the respect, admiration, and voluntary deference individuals are afforded by others. It is distinct from related constructs such as power, financial success, and social belongingness. A review of diverse literatures lent support to the status hypothesis: People's subjective well-being, self-esteem, and mental and physical health appear to depend on the level of status they are accorded by others. People engage in a wide range of goal-directed activities to manage their status, aided by myriad cognitive, behavioral, and affective processes; for example, they vigilantly monitor the status dynamics in their social environment, strive to appear socially valuable, prefer and select social environments that offer them higher status, and react strongly when their status is threatened. The desire for status also does not appear to be a mere derivative of the need to belong, as some theorists have speculated. Finally, the importance of status was observed across individuals who differed in culture, gender, age, and personality, supporting the universality of the status motive. Therefore, taken as a whole, the relevant evidence suggests that the desire for status is indeed fundamental.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 601
页数:28
相关论文
共 291 条
[1]   The roles of the social rank and attachment systems in social anxiety [J].
Aderka, Idan M. ;
Weisman, Ora ;
Shahar, Golan ;
Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 47 (04) :284-288
[2]   Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women [J].
Adler, NE ;
Epel, ES ;
Castellazzo, G ;
Ickovics, JR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) :586-592
[3]   SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS AND HEALTH - THE CHALLENGE OF THE GRADIENT [J].
ADLER, NE ;
BOYCE, T ;
CHESNEY, MA ;
COHEN, S ;
FOLKMAN, S ;
KAHN, RL ;
SYME, SL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (01) :15-24
[4]  
Alicke M.D., 2005, The self in social judgment, P85, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203943250-11
[5]  
Allan Steven, 1997, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, V36, P467
[6]   How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? [J].
Alpizar, F ;
Carlsson, F ;
Johansson-Stenman, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2005, 56 (03) :405-421
[7]   Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups [J].
Anderson, C ;
John, OP ;
Keltner, D ;
Kring, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :116-132
[8]   Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one's status in a group [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Ames, Daniel R. ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2008, 34 (01) :90-101
[9]   Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Srivastava, Sanjay ;
Beer, Jennifer S. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. ;
Chatman, Jennifer A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1094-1110
[10]   Perspectives on Power in Organizations [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Brion, Sebastien .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 1, 2014, 1 :67-97