Novel and transgenic food crops: Overview of scientific versus public perception

被引:13
作者
Ruibal-Mendieta, NL
Lints, FA
机构
[1] Univ Catholique Louvain, Fac Sci Agron, Unite Biochim Nutr, European Interuniv Assoc Soc Sci & Technol, B-1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[2] Univ Catholique Louvain, Fac Agron Sci, Genet Lab, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
关键词
plant biotechnology; genetically modified food crops; scientific perception; public perception; public information; consensus conference;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008845323046
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Recombinant DNA technology offers opportunities to develop new products in many different fields, including agriculture and the agro-food area. Transgenic plants with improved agronomic traits currently grow in field trials and a few varieties have already reached the European market. By and large, new technologies raise both concerns and expectations and modem biotechnology is no exception. Indeed, a voluntary moratorium on experiments involving recombinant DNA molecules was called for in 1974. At the present time, although a majority of academic and industrial scientists agree that transgenic food crops pose no risk for the environment or human health, some others believe that certain applications of modern plant biotechnology are hazardous. In particular, deliberate releases of genetically modified plants are regarded as risky. There is also a disparity between expert and lay perception of r-DNA technology applications to food crops, which makes public information a difficult task. This paper aims at exposing these conflicting points of view on the agricultural applications of modern biotechnology. We also propose some recommendations pertaining to public information in Europe. It appears that consensus conferences might be a good approach to stimulate public information and public debate in Europe, although this approach has to be adapted to the cultural context of each country.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 386
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] *ADA, 1995, J AM DIET ASSOC, V95, P1429
  • [2] Preventing food allergy: Emerging technologies
    Astwood, JD
    Fuchs, RL
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 7 (07) : 219 - 226
  • [3] ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON RECOMBINANT DNA-MOLECULES
    BERG, P
    BALTIMORE, D
    BRENNER, S
    ROBLIN, RO
    SINGER, MF
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1975, 188 (4192) : 991 - 994
  • [4] THE RECOMBINANT-DNA CONTROVERSY - 20 YEARS LATER
    BERG, P
    SINGER, M
    [J]. BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 13 (10): : 1132 - 1134
  • [5] BIERI F, 1994, METHOD FIND EXP CLIN, V16, P491
  • [6] Cantley M. F., 1992, Biotechnology in public: a review of recent research., P18
  • [7] WHOS WHO IN EUROPEAN ANTIBIOTECH
    DIXON, B
    [J]. BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 11 (01): : 44 - 48
  • [8] DURANT J, 1994, UK NAT CONS C PLANT, P1
  • [9] UK NATIONAL CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY
    ELLAHI, B
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) : 35 - 41
  • [10] Frewer L. J., 1995, British Food Journal, V97, P31, DOI 10.1108/00070709510100118