Efficacy of taxanes as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

被引:23
作者
Gines, Jordi [1 ]
Sabater, Eliazar [2 ]
Martorell, Clara [1 ]
Grau, Maria [2 ]
Monroy, Marta [1 ]
Casado, Miguel A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Son Espases, Serv Farm, ES-07010 Palma De Mallorca, Baleares, Spain
[2] Pharmacoecon & Outcomes Res Iberia, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Taxanes; Docetaxel; Paclitaxel; Meta-analysis; Adjuvant treatment; Breast cancer; DOXORUBICIN PLUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; PHASE-III TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; DOSE-DENSE; SURVIVAL BENEFIT; HIGH-RISK; CHEMOTHERAPY; PACLITAXEL; DOCETAXEL; EPIRUBICIN;
D O I
10.1007/s12094-011-0686-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To evaluate the magnitude of benefit obtained by taxanes as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and to assess the best method for their administration. We performed a systematic search of phase III randomised clinical trials that included patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in whom comparisons were chemotherapy (CT) containing a taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) vs. CT without taxanes (first-generation trials), or CT with taxane in both treatment arms (second-generation trials), administered after surgery. The parameters of efficacy evaluated were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The data obtained in the first-generation trials (number of relapses and deaths) were submitted to a meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) combined with DerSimonian and Laird (OR DL) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. Further, an analysis was performed of those trials that included only patients with nodal involvement (N+). In both cases, the results were also analysed as a function of the taxane used, and with indirect comparisons between the two. The second-generation trials were analysed to assess the optimum method of administration. A total of 17 trials were selected for the metaanalysis (30,672 patients). The OR DL was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.76=2-0.88) for DFS and 0.83 (95%CI: 0.75-0.91) for OS. In N+ patients the results were 0.80 (95%CI: 0.74-0.86) and 0.79 (95%CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively. Docetaxel and paclitaxel significantly increased the DFS and OS. In our indirect comparison, the benefit of docetaxel on OS was significantly superior to that obtained with paclitaxel in N+ patients (OR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.63-0.98). The administration of adjuvant CT-based taxanes reduces the risk of relapse and death. This reduction is superior in clinical trials that included only N+ patients. With the available evidence, it would appear that the best method of administering paclitaxel is weekly and for docetaxel tri-weekly.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 498
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27 [J].
Bear, HD ;
Anderson, S ;
Smith, RE ;
Geyer, CE ;
Mamounas, EP ;
Fisher, B ;
Brown, AM ;
Robidoux, A ;
Margolese, R ;
Kahlenberg, MS ;
Paik, S ;
Soran, A ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Wolmark, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (13) :2019-2027
[3]   30 years' follow up of randomised studies of adjuvant CMF in operable breast cancer: cohort study [J].
Bonadonna, G ;
Moliterni, A ;
Zambetti, M ;
Daidone, MG ;
Pilotti, S ;
Gianni, L ;
Valagussa, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7485) :217-220
[4]   Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer:: 10-year follow-up results of The French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial [J].
Bonneterre, J ;
Roché, H ;
Kerbrat, P ;
Brémond, A ;
Fumoleau, P ;
Namer, M ;
Goudier, MJ ;
Schraub, S ;
Fargeot, P ;
Chapelle-Marcillac, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (12) :2686-2693
[5]   Benefit of taxanes as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer - Pooled analysis of 15,500 patients [J].
Bria, Emilio ;
Nistico, Cecilia ;
Cuppone, Federica ;
Carlini, Paolo ;
Ciccarese, Mariangela ;
Milella, Michele ;
Natoli, Guido ;
Terzoli, Edmondo ;
Cognetti, Francesco ;
Giannarelli, Diana .
CANCER, 2006, 106 (11) :2337-2344
[6]   The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bucher, HC ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Griffith, LE ;
Walter, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :683-691
[7]   Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil Versus Dose-Dense Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Versus Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel in Node-Positive or High-Risk Node-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Burnell, Margot ;
Levine, Mark N. ;
Chapman, Judith-Anne W. ;
Bramwell, Vivien ;
Gelmon, Karen ;
Walley, Barbara ;
Vandenberg, Ted ;
Chalchal, Haji ;
Albain, Kathy S. ;
Perez, Edith A. ;
Rugo, Hope ;
Pritchard, Kathleen ;
O'Brien, Patti ;
Shepherd, Lois E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (01) :77-82
[8]  
Buzdar AU, 2002, CLIN CANCER RES, V8, P1073
[9]   Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502
[10]   Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: First report of intergroup trial C9741/cancer and leukemia group B trial 9741 [J].
Citron, ML ;
Berry, DA ;
Cirrincione, C ;
Hudis, C ;
Winer, EP ;
Gradishar, WJ ;
Davidson, NE ;
Martino, S ;
Livingston, R ;
Ingle, JN ;
Perez, EA ;
Carpenter, J ;
Hurd, D ;
Holland, JF ;
Smith, BL ;
Sartor, CI ;
Leung, EH ;
Abrams, J ;
Schilsky, RL ;
Muss, HB ;
Norton, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (08) :1431-1439