Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials

被引:152
作者
Glanz, M
Klawansky, S
Stason, W
Berkey, C
Chalmers, TC
机构
[1] Technology Assessment Group, Dept. of Hlth. Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
[2] Technology Assessment Group, Dept. of Hlth. Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1996年 / 77卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90293-2
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES) in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis in stroke. Design: A meta-analysis combined the reported randomized controlled trials of FES in stroke, using the effect size method of Glass, and the DerSimonian-Laird Random Effects Method for pooling studies. Setting: The included studies were pulished between 1978 and 1992. They were conducted in academic rehabilitation medicine settings. Patients: In all included studies, patients were in poststroke rehabilitation. The mean time after stroke varied from 1.5 to 29.2 months. Intervention: FES applied to a muscle or associated nerve in a hemiparetic extremity was compared to No FES. Main Outcome Measure: Change in paretic muscle force of contraction following FES was compared to change without FES. Results: For the four included studies, the mean effect size was .63 (95% Cl: .29, .98). This result was statistically significant (p < .05). Conclusion: Pooling from randomized trials supports FES as promoting recovery of muscle strength after stroke. This effect is statistically significant. There is a reasonable liklihood of clinical significance as well. (C) 1996 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 553
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*AM HEART ASS, 1992, 1993 STROK FACTS
[2]   NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC CHANGES IN HEMIPLEGIA - POSSIBLE EXPLANATION FOR INITIAL DISPARITY BETWEEN MUSCLE TONE AND TENDON REFLEXES [J].
ASHBY, P ;
VERRIER, M .
NEUROLOGY, 1976, 26 (12) :1145-1151
[3]   DISCORDANCE BETWEEN METAANALYSES AND LARGE-SCALE RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS - EXAMPLES FROM THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
BORZAK, S ;
RIDKER, PM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 123 (11) :873-877
[4]  
BOWMAN BR, 1979, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V60, P497
[5]   A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL [J].
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
BLACKBURN, B ;
SILVERMAN, B ;
SCHROEDER, B ;
REITMAN, D ;
AMBROZ, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1981, 2 (01) :31-49
[6]  
COOK DJ, 1992, CHEST, V102, pS305
[7]  
COZEAN CD, 1988, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V69, P401
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   FOCUSED STROKE REHABILITATION PROGRAMS DO NOT IMPROVE OUTCOME [J].
DOBKIN, BH .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1989, 46 (06) :701-703
[10]  
Duncan PW., 1987, STROKE REHABILITATIO